ABC Pty Ltd is a start-up tech company (the ‘Company’)…

MIS604 Assessment One Page 1 of 10 ASSESSMENT BRIEFSubject Code and TitleMIS604 Requirement EngineeringAssessmentOne – Group AssessmentIndividual/GroupGroupLength15 Minutes Presentation + 2000 Words WrittenAssignmentLearning Outcomesa-bSubmissionDue 23:59…

MIS604 Assessment One Page 1 of 10

ASSESSMENT BRIEFSubject Code and TitleMIS604 Requirement EngineeringAssessmentOne – Group AssessmentIndividual/GroupGroupLength15 Minutes Presentation + 2000 Words WrittenAssignmentLearning Outcomesa-bSubmissionDue 23:59 (Sydney time) Friday, end of module 2.2.Each group presents in Module 3.Weighting30%Total Marks30 marks

Context:In your reading and activities for this subject, you have discovered the concept of requirementengineering and the entire procedures that involved in the process derived from the real-world cases.You also explored the importance of requirement engineering and the relevant case studies haveguided you to understand it further. By undertaking this assessment, you will be able to contextualiseand explain the high-level concepts of requirement engineering and explain the role of requirementengineering in achieving organizational success.Task Instructions:You, as a group, should first read and understand the following case before proceeding to answer thequestions in Assessment Tasks section. Note that every piece of information provided in the followingcase serves a purpose.The caseABC Pty Ltd is a start-up tech company (the ‘Company’) based in Sydney Australia. They are currentlyseeking to develop a mobile app or a web application (collectively called an ‘app’), which provide ondemand trades & handyman services to their customers. The objective of the app is to connecttradesmen and customers. ABC envisioned that this app will provide a strong revenue stream to thecompany and other business opportunities from a wide handyman network.The founder of the Company has envisaged an app that enable customers to find trustworthytradesmen to get the job done; it is also a platform for tradespersons to find jobs and earn an extraincome stream. Typical jobs posted on the platform should include home cleaning, heating and coolingsystem services, gardening, airport pick up & delivery, IKEA furniture assembly, garbage removal,MIS604 Assessment One Page 2 of 10plumbing, and other tradesmen & handyman jobs. The founder also provided the following very highlevel and rough ideas for the app:For customers, they can post job(s) on the app, browse through tradespersons’ profile, and contactthem through the in-app instant messenger.For tradespersons, they can put up a profile on the app, browse through jobs available, and contactcustomers through the in-app instance messenger.Once the job is completed, payment can be made securely through the app. The customer will alsohave the opportunity to rate and review the tradesperson.ABC wants to push this app to the market in the next six months and have secured an investment forthis app.ABC has engaged you (i.e. a group of you) as the requirements analyst in this project.Assessment tasksPart A. As a group write a report addressing the following tasks:1. Establish your credentials in giving requirements engineering advice to ABC. Note that you arenot a student in this case. You are required to undertake some research and identifyqualifications, certificates or experiences related to requirements engineering that will add toyour credentials.2. Advise ABC Pty Ltd of the importance of requirements engineering, and the implications ofnot having in place proper requirement engineering practices in the project.3. Advise ABC Pty Ltd of the key processes in requirements engineering in relation to the project.Provide (a) a description of each requirements engineering process; (b) the objectives, themain activities, key stakeholders and outputs of each process.4. Advise ABC Pty Ltd of a plan for requirement elicitation for the proposed app. Given the natureof this app, what are the requirements elicitation activities you would perform? Justify yourchoices. Provide detailed descriptions of at least two requirements elicitation techniques. Forexample, if an interview is to be conducted, you will need to provide:• who are the interviewees;• who are the interviewers;• the interview questions;5. Based on the case description and use common sense, for the proposed app, lista. At least two (2) business requirements;b. At least five (5) functional requirements;c. At least three (3) non-functional requirements;The requirements must satisfy the criteria of a “good” requirement discussed in Module 2.1.Your report should include the following1. Title page: Subject code and name, assessment number, report title, assessment due date, wordcount (actual), student names, student IDs, Torrens email address, campus learning facilitator, andSubject coordinator. Not included in the word count.2. Executive summary: should include the purpose of the report, the problem including key issuesconsidered and how they were investigated, and your findings. This part should be approximatelyMIS604 Assessment One Page 3 of 10three quarters of an A4 page but must not be longer than one (1) A4 page. Not included in the wordcount.3. Table of Contents (ToC): should list the report topics using decimal notation. Need to include themain headings and subheadings with corresponding page numbers, using a format that makes thehierarchy of topics clear. Because you are including a ToC the report pages should be numbered in thefooter as follows: title page has no page number; and main text to have Arabic numerals commencingat 1. Create the ToC using MS Word’s ToC auto-generator rather than manually typing out the ToC.Instructions can be found here https://support.office.com/en-gb/article/Create- a-table-of-contentsor-update-a-table-of-contents-eb275189-b93e-4559-8dd9-c279457bfd72#__create_a_table. Notincluded in the word count.4. Introduction: provide a brief description of the company as given in the case scenario including anyassumptions, a concise overview of the problem you have been asked to research, the mainaims/purpose of the report, the objectives to be achieved by writing the report (include the tasksoutlined in the case study) and how you investigated the problem. Provide an outline of the sectionsof the report. Should be approximately 200 words.5. Body of the report (use appropriate headings in the body of the report.): Ensure that you addressthe tasks listed in the case study scenario. Do NOT use generic words such as ‘Body, Body of theReport, Tasks’ as section headings. Create meaningful headings and subheadings that reflect the topicand content of your report. Should be approximately 1600 words.6. Conclusion: restate the purpose of the report and key issues investigated and the related findingsbased on your research and analysis. Explain the significance of your findings for addressing theproblem stated in the case scenario and any limitations. State how your report has achieved itsobjectives and any future work to be considered. Should be approximately 200 words.7. Reference list. Not included in the word count.8. Appendices if necessary. Not included in the word count.Part B. Present to the class a 10-minute group presentation. Your presentation should include:• The requirement elicitation plan;• At least two (2) business requirements for the proposed app;• At least five (5) functional requirements for the proposed app;• At least three (3) non-functional requirements for the proposed app;The presentation will be followed by a 5-minute Question & Answer session. All presentation will bescheduled in Module 3 (Week 5 and 6).General Assessment RequirementIncomprehensible submissions. Assessments provide the opportunity for students to demonstratetheir knowledge and skills to achieve the required standard. To do this, assessment responses needto be both clear and easy to understand. If not, the University cannot determine that students havedemonstrated their knowledge and skills. Assessments will, therefore, be marked accordinglyincluding the potential for 0 (zero) marks where relevant.Case study. Assessment response must focus on the case study scenario given in the Task Instructions.Any assessment items that do not address the case study scenario may be awarded 0 (zero) marks.MIS604 Assessment One Page 4 of 10Track changes. If you use Track Changes when writing your assessment, you must ensure that thesubmitted document is the final and correct version of the document. That is, if your submitted reportcontains Track Changes or Comments or any other editing marks it may be awarded 0 (zero) marks. Itis your responsibility to submit the final and correct version of your report.Check with marking criteria. Before submitting your assessment, you should check it against theassessment criteria and the marking rubric included in this specification to ensure that you havesatisfactorily addressed all the criteria that will be used to mark your submission.Academic language. All submissions should be thoroughly proof-read for spelling, typographical orgrammatical errors before being submitted. Do not reply on the ‘spell-check’ function in your wordprocessing program. If, for example, ‘affect’ is substituted for ‘effect’, your program may not detectthe error.Group Assessment RequirementGroup assessment. This assessment is a group assignment for all students. Each group consists of 2 or3 students. To ensure your success in this group assignment, please read and follow theserequirements regarding group formation, registration and administration.Group FormationGroup size. Each group consists of 2 or 3 students. Groups of more than 3 students must be split intotwo or more groups. Given the amount of work you need to undertake in this assignment, it is highlysuggested that you form a group of 3 students. You may be added by the Learning Facilitator to groupsthat consists of less than 3 students after Module 2.1.Inter-class groups. You must only form groups within the Class you are enrolled in. No inter-classgroups are allowed.Remain in the same group. You must remain in the same group for this assessment.Freedom to form groups before the deadline. You have the freedom to choose your group membersbefore the registration deadline. After the registration deadline, however, those who are not in agroup will be allocated to a group by the Learning Facilitator.Group RegistrationDeadline. The deadline for group registration is 11:45pm AEST Friday Module 2.1.Penalty for not registering before the deadline. If you are not registered before the deadline you willreceive no penalty on your marks; you will, however, lose the freedom to form a group on your own.The Learning Facilitator will assign you into a group.Means of registration. To register your group, you must send your Learning Facilitator an email with“[MIS604] Group Registration” in the subject line. In the body of that email, you must list out the nameand your student ID for each member in their group. The registration email must arrive at yourLearning Facilitator’s inbox before the registration deadline to be a valid registration.Group AdministrationConflicts. If there is anything that you think you will need to involve your Learning Facilitator, pleasedo not hesitate to do so.MIS604 Assessment One Page 5 of 10Burden to prove. If you make any allegation against any other group members, you bear the evidentialonus to prove your allegation and claims.Group marks. Everyone in the same group will receive the same mark unless:• there is an issue brought to the attention of the Learning Facilitator; and• the Learning Facilitator finds it is fundamentally unfair to give every group member the samemark.You may be removed from a group. In some circumstances, you may be removed from you group dueto your significant and persistent lack of contribution. Once it happens, those being removed from agroup will need to undertake all assessment individually from the time they are removed. The markingstandard and criteria will remain the same.ReferencingIt is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see moreinformation on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencingSubmission Instructions:Means of submission. ALL students must submit ONE MSWord document (.doc or .docx) and ONEMSPowerPoint document (.ppt or .pptx) via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu inMIS604: Requirements Engineering. Physical copies/Email submissions are not accepted.No Zipped files. Students must NOT zip the MSWord document and MSPowerPoint and submit it asone single zip/compressed file.Complete and correct submission. Assessment, once submitted, are FINAL and therefore cannot bemodified. You bear all the onus to ensure that your submissions are final, correct (correct files incorrect format) and complete before submitting to Blackboard.You are expected to begin this assessment when you begin the trimester, especially as you relate thelearning activities (formative assessment) in the modules to this and the other (summative)assessments. Be sure to keep several drafts of your work as well as your notes and any sources youused to draw on in preparing your report.Extensions will be considered only in extenuating circumstances where the student has applied beforethe due date. At that point, students are required to provide the latest draft, in case the extension isnot granted and to demonstrate they have earnestly done everything to avoid lateness.Students are responsible for keeping appropriate back-ups and drafts of their assignments and tosubmit the correct version.Torrens University Australia policies apply to the preparation and submission of this assignment.MIS604 Assessment One Page 6 of10Learning Rubric: Assessment One

AssessmentAttributesFail (Unacceptable)0-49%Pass(Functional)50-64%Credit(Proficient)65-74%Distinction(Advanced)75 -84%High Distinction(Exceptional)85-100%Establishment ofCredentials(2 marks)Does not include or doesnot recognise theimportance of establishingthe credentials of theconsultant. May provide acursory or incompleterepresentation ofcredentials.Provides a narrative on thecredentials of the authorsthat may be cursory or thatdoes not appreciate theimportance of undertakingthe activity. Treats the taskas a chore rather than as anopportunity.Provides a narrative of thecredentials of the authorsthat imbues a sense ofcautionary proceedingthrough to the rest of thepaper. Attempts to engagewith the audience but maynot show empathy for them.Establishes the credentialsof the authors, inspiringtrust and excitement in thereader to read on. Showsempathy for the reader andengages them withconfidence.Expertly establishes thecredentials of the authorsof the report, inspiring asense of security and trustin the reader by setting therest of the business paperup for immediate andsustained acceptance.The importance ofrequirementsengineering and theimplication of nothaving it in place.(3 marks)Does not demonstrate abasic understanding ofrequirements engineering.Provides a high-leveldescription of either theimportance ofrequirements engineeringor the implication of nothaving it in place. Theunderstanding of the roleand impact of requirementengineering may not becorrect.Provides a high-leveldescription of the role andimpact of requirementsengineerings, but thediscussion is not in-depth.Evaluates the importance ofrequirements engineeringand discussed theimplications of not having itin place. The understandingof the role and impact ofrequirements engineering iscorrect, but there is roomfor improvement in thearticulation of arguments.Critically evaluates theimportance ofrequirements engineering,the arguments are wellarticulated and based onresearch.Key processes inrequirementsengineering(5 marks)Provides a description ofless than three processesin requirementsengineering;The description is notrelated to the case.Provides a description ofthree processes inrequirements engineering;The description is notrelated to the case.Provides a description of allthe key processes inrequirements engineering;The description is not relatedto the case and theunderstanding of one processis not correct.Provides a comprehensivesurvey of all the keyprocesses in requirementsengineering;The description may not beclosely related to the case.Provides a comprehensivedescription of all the keyprocesses in requirementsengineering;The description is very wellwritten and related to thecase.

MIS604 Assessment One Page 7 of10

AssessmentAttributesFail (Unacceptable)0-49%Pass(Functional)50-64%Credit(Proficient)65-74%Distinction(Advanced)75 -84%High Distinction(Exceptional)85-100%Requirement elicitation(5 marks)The techniques providedcannot be regarded asrequirements elicitationtechniques;No justification for thechoice of requirementselicitation techniques;Little or no descriptionprovided for therequirement elicitationtechniques;No requirement elicitationplan is provided.Provides one requirementselicitation technique.Little or no justificationprovided for the choice ofthat requirementselicitation technique;The description for thatrequirements elicitationtechnique is vague and notrelated to the case.The requirement elicitationplan is vague andincomplete.Provides two requirementselicitation techniques, one ofwhich may not be suitable forthe case;There is significant room forimprovements in thejustification for bothrequirements elicitationtechniques;High-level description of bothrequirements elicitationtechniques, which may notbe related to case;Provided a requirementselicitation plan that may notbe relevant to the case;Provides two requirementselicitation techniques thatare suitable for the case;Provides justification forboth requirementselicitation techniques, butthe arguments may not besound;Detailed description of bothrequirements elicitationtechniques, which is relatedto the case;Provided a requirementselicitation plan that isrelevant to the caseProvides two requirementselicitation techniques thatare suitable for the case;Sound justification for bothrequirements elicitationtechniques;Comprehensive anddetailed description of bothrequirement elicitationtechniques, which is closelyrelated to the case;Provided a detailedrequirements elicitationplan that is relevant for thecase;

MIS604 Assessment One Page 8 of10

AssessmentAttributesFail (Unacceptable)0-49%Pass(Functional)50-64%Credit(Proficient)65-74%Distinction(Advanced)75 -84%High Distinction(Exceptional)85-100%Business, functionaland non-functionalrequirements.(5 marks)Provided less than 6requirements altogether;All or most requirementsare remotely relevant tothe case;Few requirements arecorrectly categorised;Few requirements satisfythe characteristics of a“good” requirement;The answer does notdemonstrate a correctand sound understandingof the different types ofrequirements and thecharacteristics of a “good”requirement.Provided 6 or morerequirements altogether;4 or more requirements arerelevant to the case;4 or more requirements arecorrectly categorised;4 or more requirementssatisfy the characteristics ofa “good” requirement;The answer lacksunderstanding of thedifferent types ofrequirements and thecharacteristics of a “good”requirement.Provided the requirednumber of requirements (10altogether);6 or more requirements arerelevant to the case;6 or more requirements arecorrectly categorised;6 or more requirementssatisfy the characteristics of a“good” requirement;The answer shows someunderstanding of thedifferent types ofrequirements and thecharacteristics of a “good”requirement.Provided the requirednumber of requirements(10 altogether);8 or more requirements arerelevant to the case;8 or more requirements arecorrectly categorised;8 or more requirementssatisfy the characteristics ofa “good” requirement;The answer demonstrates aworking understanding ofthe different types ofrequirements and thecharacteristics of a “good”requirement.Provided the requirednumber of requirements(10 altogether);All requirements arerelevant to the case;All requirements arecorrectly categorised;All requirements satisfy thecharacteristics of a “good”requirement;The answer demonstrates acorrect and soundunderstanding of thedifferent types ofrequirements and thecharacteristics of a “good”requirement.

MIS604 Assessment One Page 9 of10

Report structure,professional writingand references(5 marks)Well synthesised andextensive research;More than 14 currentreferences.Approximately 60% ormore of the referenceswere academicreferences.Thorough referencing.Citations and referencelist accurate andconsistent with TorrensAPA referencing style.All citations/referenceslisted.Written expression wasclear and correct;Grammar excellent;correct use ofpunctuation; minimal orno spelling errors; andevidence of thoroughproof-reading.Report structure iscomplete, included: AnExecutive Summary, ToC,Table of Content,Introduction, Body,Conclusion, References.Basic research;At least ten currentreferences but less than sixacademic references.Some errors with TorrensAPA referencing style.Incomplete reference list.References not citedproperly in text.Some major grammatical orproofreading errors.Language frequentlyweakened by inexact wordchoices. Spelling errors.A few structural elementsare missing.Well synthesised andextensive research;More than 14 currentreferences.Approximately 60% or moreof the references wereacademic references.Thorough referencing.Citations and reference listaccurate and consistent withTorrens APA referencingstyle.All citations/references listed.Written expression was clearand correct; Grammarexcellent; correct use ofpunctuation; minimal or nospelling errors; and evidenceof thorough proof-reading.Report structure is complete,included: An ExecutiveSummary, ToC, Table ofContent, Introduction, Body,Conclusion, References.Well synthesised andextensive research;More than 14 currentreferences.Approximately 60% or moreof the references wereacademic references.Thorough referencing.Citations and reference listaccurate and consistentwith Torrens APAreferencing style.All citations/referenceslisted.Written expression wasclear and correct; Grammarexcellent; correct use ofpunctuation; minimal or nospelling errors; andevidence of thorough proofreading.Report structure iscomplete, included: AnExecutive Summary, ToC,Table of Content,Introduction, Body,Conclusion, References.Well synthesised andextensive research;More than 14 currentreferences.Approximately 60% ormore of the referenceswere academic references.Thorough referencing.Citations and reference listaccurate and consistentwith Torrens APAreferencing style.All citations/referenceslisted.Written expression wasclear and correct; Grammarexcellent; correct use ofpunctuation; minimal or nospelling errors; andevidence of thoroughproof-reading.Report structure iscomplete, included: AnExecutive Summary, ToC,Table of Content,Introduction, Body,Conclusion, References.

MIS604 Assessment One Page 10 of10

AssessmentAttributesFail (Unacceptable)0-49%Pass(Functional)50-64%Credit(Proficient)65-74%Distinction(Advanced)75 -84%High Distinction(Exceptional)85-100%Presentation(5 marks)Difficult to understand foraudience, no logical/clearstructure, poor flow ofideas, argument lackssupporting evidence.Audience cannot followthe line of reasoning.Information, arguments andevidence are presented in away that is not always clearand logical.Line of reasoning is oftendifficult to follow.Information, arguments andevidence are well presented,mostly clear flow of ideas andarguments.Line of reasoning is easy tofollow.Information, arguments andevidence are very wellpresented; the presentationis logical, clear and wellsupported by evidence.Demonstrates culturalsensitivity.Expertly presented; thepresentation is logical,persuasive, and wellsupported by evidence,demonstrating a clear flowof ideas and arguments.Engages and sustainsaudience’s interest in thetopic, demonstrates highlevels of cultural sensitivityEffective use of diversepresentation aids, includinggraphics and multi-media.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Do you need any assistance with this question?
Send us your paper details now
We’ll find the best professional writer for you!

 



error: Content is protected !!