Assessment Item 2 Marking Criteria

Evidence for Nursing Assessment Item 2 Marking Criteria (35% of the total subject mark) Autumn 2020 Weighting Criterion High Distinction (100%-85%) Distinction (84%-75%) Credit (74%-65%)…

Evidence
for Nursing Assessment
Item 2 Marking Criteria (35% of the total subject mark)

Autumn 2020

Weighting

Criterion

High
Distinction

(100%-85%)

Distinction

(84%-75%)

Credit

(74%-65%)

Pass

(64%-50%)

Fail

(49%-0%)

50%

Evidence
of understanding of the evidence-based practice (EBP) concepts

Answers
all the first five questions comprehensively and correctly.
Evidence incorporated correctly where appropriate.
All
responses are clearly written and have no or very few grammatical
errors.

14.8-
17.5 marks

There
are minor errors/ missing information in answering the first five
questions.
Evidence incorporated where appropriate. There is no or minor
grammatically errors.

13.12-14.7
marks

The
first five questions are mostly correctly answered. The
examinations are mostly clear, with a few grammatical errors.

11.37-12.95
marks

There
are some errors/ missing information in answering the questions,
or only some of the questions are clearly answered. Some
grammatical errors exist.

8.75-11.2
marks

The
first five questions are poorly answered, with many errors/
missing information. There are many grammatical errors or no
reference to evidence.

<8.75
marks

26%

Evidence
of the ability to critically appraise evidence

Uses
a valid appraisal tool to correctly and comprehensively appraise
the given article.

7.65-9
marks

There
are minor errors or missing information in the appraisal of the
given article.

6.75-7.56
marks

Most
of the questions in the appraisal tool are correctly and fully
answered.

5.85-6.66
marks

Some
strengths and weakness of the given article are discussed.

4.5-5.76
marks

The
article is not appraised, answers to the questions are only
yes/no, or the questions superficially answered with many
mistakes/ missing information.

<4.5

24%

Evidence
of the ability to present and interpret the results, and make
sense of the applicability of the evidence.

Presents
and interprets the results correctly and comprehensively.
Discusses the applicability of the results with the consideration
of the benefits, side effects, and the cost.

7.22-
8.5 marks

There
are minor errors/ missing information in presentation and
interpretation of the results. Applicability of the results are
discussed with minor missing information.

6.37-7.14
marks

The
presentation and interpretation of the results are mostly correct.
Applicability
of the results are discussed with the consideration of main
benefits, side effects, and cost.
5.52-
6.29 marks

There
are some errors/ missing information in the presentation and
interpretation of the results. Applicability of the results are
discussed with some errors, missing information.

4.25-5.44
marks

The
results are poorly presented, and no evidence of the understanding
of the results. Applicability of the results have not been
discussed or poorly presented.

<4.25
marks

CookMyProject
Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Do you need any assistance with this question?
Send us your paper details now
We’ll find the best professional writer for you!

 



error: Content is protected !!