CNA340 DEVELOPING PROFESSIONAL NURSING PRACTICE
Assessment one Marking Rubric
Assessment Criteria HD DN CR PP NNCriterion one: 30%You provide adescriptive andprofessional account ofa situation within oneof the categoriesprovided above belowCategories:– professionalcommunication,– accountability– Person-centredcare.You have provided aneloquent and highlyprofessional account ofa situation relating toone of the categories.The context is welldefined and described.You have provided adetailed descriptiveand professionalaccount of a situationrelating to one of thecategories.Context is clear.You have provided adescriptive andprofessional account ofa situation relating toone of the categoriesoutlined.Context is mostly clear.You have provided abasic description andmostly professionalaccount of a situationrelating to one of thecategories outlined.You have not providedan adequatedescription of asituation from PEP.The topic is unrelatedto any of thecategories.Your description isunprofessional orinappropriate.Criterion two: 20%You demonstrate theability to reflect in andon action.You havedemonstrated strongreflective capacity inboth domains:reflection-in-actionand refection-onaction.You havedemonstrated goodreflective capacity inboth domains:reflection-in-actionand refection-onaction.You havedemonstratedreflective capacity inboth domains, withone domain showingstronger skills.You havedemonstratedbeginning levelreflective abilities inboth domains.You have notdemonstrated yourability to reflect duringpractice and afterpractice OR you haveonly addressed onedomain.Criterion three: 40%You demonstrate theability to draw uponcritical reflection (25%)to inform individualpractice priorities toYou havedemonstrated strongcritical reflectionthrough soundreasoning and enquirythat underpins deepYou havedemonstratedeffective criticalreflection with goodreasoning and enquirythrough a deeperYou havedemonstrated criticalreflection withbeginning levelreasoning through aYou have provided anevent summary ratherthan a criticalreflection.You have notdemonstrated yourability to utilise criticalreflection.
inform yourprofessionaldevelopment(15%)critical analyses of yoursituation.You have providedstrong evidence ofsynthesis of ideas andinsights gained.analysis of thesituation.You have providedsome evidence ofsynthesis of ideas andinsights gained.basic analysis of thesituation.What you have drawnon is illogical and doesnot link to anyindividual practicepriorities.Critical reflection hasdirectly, clearly andlogically informed yourpractice priorities.Your professionaldevelopment valuesare clear and wellemphasised.Critical reflection hasclearly informed yourpractice priorities.Your professionaldevelopment valuesare well expressed.Critical reflection hasinformed practicepriorities towards yourprofessionaldevelopment.You havedemonstrated somereflection to guide apractice priority.Practice priority (s) arelimited to one domainand or/mostly clear.Your professionaldevelopment withinthis context is mostlyclear.Your reflection omitsclear practicepriorities.Your reflection doesnot link to yourprofessionaldevelopmentadequately.Criterion four: 10%You use sound andprofessional writtenacademic skills. Anyreferencing aligns withthe Harvard style aspreferred by UTASYour academic writingis at a high level withstrong evidence ofplanning.Discussion isconsistently expressedin a clear and fluentmanner; grammar,punctuation andsyntax are error free.Your academic writingis at a high level ofwith evidence ofplanning.Discussion isconsistently expressedin a clear and fluentmanner, with very fewor minor errors ofgrammar, syntax orpunctuation.You communicated inacademic writing byusing coherent andcohesive planning.Discussion is mainlyclear and fluent, someerrors of grammar/syntax/punctuation arepresent but do notaffect clarity ofmeaning.You communicated inacademic writing byusing coherent andpartly cohesiveexpression.Discussion is mainlyclear but errors ofgrammar / syntax /punctuation arepresent and may affectthe flow of writing.The clarity of yourpaper is hindered bypoor structure, poorgrammar, andstructure (littleevidence of planning).If references used:Inaccurate/poorreferencing style ordoes not use theHarvard style.
If references used:Accurately referencedall sources using theHarvard style, withouterror in-text or in list.If references used:Accurately referencedall sources using theHarvard style; minorerrors in-text or in list.If references used:Accurately referencedthe majority of sourcesusing the Harvard styleboth in-text and in list.If references used:Accurately referencedmost sources using theHarvard style guide ORmore referencesneeded in places.
Let’s block ads! (Why?)