ASSESSMENT TASK 1: Individual Case Study

ASSESSMENT TASK 1: Individual Case Study Marking Criteria – Weighting: 40% ASSESSMENT TASK 1: Individual Case Study Marking Criteria – Weighting: 40% AssessmentCriteriaHIGHDISTINCTIONHigh HD1 0…

ASSESSMENT TASK 1: Individual Case Study Marking Criteria – Weighting: 40%

ASSESSMENT TASK 1: Individual Case Study Marking Criteria – Weighting: 40%

AssessmentCriteriaHIGHDISTINCTIONHigh HD1 0 0 – 9 5HIGHDISTINCTIONLow HD94-85DISTINCTION75-84CREDIT65-74PASS50-64FAIL49-30FAIL29-1NOATTEMPT0MARKLanguageAwareness andSequencingThe language issophisticated, withintegratedprofessionallanguage andterminology, andsuits the purpose forwhich the essay isintendedContent isorganised, and thereis a logicalprogression of ideasthat promotes flowof thought.The language isappropriate, withintegratedprofessionallanguage andterminology, andsuits the purpose forwhich the essay isintendedContent isorganised, and thereis a logicalprogression of ideasthat promotes flow ofthought. The essayends with rationalconclusionThe language isappropriate withintegratedterminology thatsuits the purposefor which the essayis intended.The content isorganised in alogical manner andpromotes the flowof thought. Theessay ends withrationaleconclusionThe language isappropriate and suitsthe purpose for whichthe essay is intendedThe content isorganised in a logicalmanner and promotesthe flow of thought.The essay ends with arational conclusion.The language isclearMost content isorganised in alogical manner,and the essayends with arationalconclusion.The language isnot clear andappropriate, itdoes notpromote flow ofthoughtContent withinthe essay is notsequenced.There is anintroductionfollowed by thebody of theessay withconcludingsentenceThe languageis not clear andappropriate, itdoes notpromote flow ofthoughtContent withinthe essay is notsequenced.There is eitherno introductionor noconclusionpresent.Thelanguage inthe essay isnot andthere is noflow ofthoughtThere is nosequencing.10%Content:CriticalThinking,Reasoning andEvaluation ofthe EvidenceA critical andconsidered case ispresented, that iswell-constructed andbalanced. Theplanned care hasbeen justified andrationale provided.There is clearevidence of the useof the clinicalreasoning cycle ininterpretation,A critical case ispresented, that iswell-constructed andbalanced. Theplanned care hasbeen justified andrationale providedThere is sufficientevidence of the useof the clinicalreasoning cycle ininterpretation,analysis andapplicationA clear, wellconstructed andbalanced case hasbeen presented.There isjustification of careprovided withevidence of criticalthinkingThere is evidenceof the use of theclinical reasoningcycle ininterpretation,A clear, wellstructured case hasbeen presented withsome justification orrationale of care.There is someevidence of criticalthinkingThere is someevidence of the use ofthe clinical reasoningcycle in one or more ofthe areas ofA clear case hasbeen presentedwith minimaljustification orrationale of careand limitedevidence of criticalthinkingThere is minimalevidence of theuse of the clinicalreasoning cycle inone or more areasA clear case hasnot beenpresented, withminimal links orevidence ofcritical thinkingevidentThere isevidence of theuse of theclinicalreasoning cycleA clear casehas not beenpresented,with minimallinks orevidence ofcritical thinkingevidentThere minimalevidence of theuse of theclinicalreasoning cycleThere is noevidence ofcriticalthinking,the contentdoes notmatch thecase studytopicThere is noevidence ofthe use ofthe clinical50%

analysis andapplicationanalysis andapplicationinterpretation, analysisand applicationreasoningcycleEvidence &ExamplesThere is evidence ofboth depth andbreadth of highquality reading.The content ispertinent to thetopic. High qualityevidence andexamples arepresented.There is evidence ofboth depth andbreadth of readingThe content ispertinent to thetopic. Qualityevidence andexamples arepresented.There is evidenceof both depth andbreadth of readingThe content isrelevant to thetopic. Qualityevidence andexamples arepresentedThere is evidence ofreading.The content isrelevant to the topic.Appropriate evidenceand examples arepresented.There is limitedevidence ofreadingThe content isrelevant to thetopic. Evidenceand examples arepresented ofvarying quality.Evidence andexamples arepresented ofvarying quality.Evidence andexamples arepresented ofpoor qualityand not relatedto case study.The content,evidenceandexamplesare notappropriateThere areno use ofrelevantevidence35%.Source &ReferencingCredible andrelevant referencesare used. Accurateuse of APAreferencing style inall instances. Arange of in-textcitations has beenused.Credible andrelevant referencesare used. Accurateuse of APAreferencing style inall instances. Arange of in-textcitations has beenused.Credible andrelevant referencesare used. Accurateuse of APAreferencing style onmost occasions. Arange of in-textcitations has beenused.Credible and relevantreferences are used.Accurate use of APAreferencing style onmost occasions. Thereis limited use of arange of in-text citationformats.Credible andrelevantreferences areused. Accurateuse of APAreferencing styleon mostoccasions. Thereis no variation ofin-text citationformat.Not allreferences arecredible and/orrelevant. Manyinaccuracieswith the APAreferencingstyle.Not allreferences arecredible and/orrelevant. Manyinaccuracieswith the APAreferencingstyleThere arenoreferencesused.5%OVERALLMARK 100%
Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Do you need any assistance with this question?
Send us your paper details now
We’ll find the best professional writer for you!

 



error: Content is protected !!