Choose any ONE of these task: A. Design a reconfigurable…

Simulation ProjectSpecifications and RequirementsELEC875Choose any ONE of these task:A. Design a reconfigurable dipole antenna, which is able to reconfigure between three different frequency bands: 3.5…

Simulation ProjectSpecifications and RequirementsELEC875Choose any ONE of these task:A.
Design a reconfigurable dipole antenna, which is able to reconfigure
between three different frequency bands: 3.5 GHz, 4 GHz, and 5 GHz.B.
Design a reconfigurable microstrip patch antenna, which is able to
reconfigure between two different frequency bands. The first band should
be 2.5 GHz and the second band should be 5 GHz.SpecificationsSimulation Projects can be conducted “individually” or in a group of “twostudents”. Under no circumstances, more than two students are permitted ina group.For task A, following are the specifications1. Use copper material for any metallic parts2. Thickness of the dipole should be no more than ?/153.
Switch to be used: PINN Diode (for specifications and lumped element
data, you can select any supplier provided you include the datasheet in
your submitted zip folder)4. Only one port should be used to feed the dipoleSpecificationsSimulation Projects can be conducted “individually” or in a group of “twostudents”. Under no circumstances, more than two students are permitted in agroup.For task B, following are the specifications1. Substrate: Rogers RT/Duriod 5880 (lossy)2. Thickness of the substrate: 1.6mm3.
Switch to be used: PINN Diode (for specifications and lumped element
data, you can select any supplier provided you include the datasheet in
your submitted zip folder)4. Only one feeding point should be used, e.g., microstrip transmission line or coaxial probe5. Input impedance should be referenced to 50-ohmsRequirementsYou are required to present the following results during Demo (for the chosen task):1. Initial antenna design for each case and its input impedance in frequency domain (No Reconfiguration)2. Briefly explain mechanism chosen to achieve reconfiguration and design choices3.
Relevant results (e.g. input impedance in frequency domain, radiation
pattern, etc) for both, ON and OFF states, assuming only resistive
lumped elements4. Relevant results (e.g. input impedance in
frequency domain, radiation pattern, etc) for both, ON and OFF states,
assuming realistic lumped element models using data-sheets5.
Comparison between the results of resistive lumped elements and
realistic lumped elements, and justifications/recommendations to improve
the design modelEvaluation and Deliverables• Simulation Project Demonstration and Viva will take as specified in iLearn using the usual room.• Please have all your Project files open on the PCs on the day, ready for demo.Ensure that you copy the results folders and bring it along on the day so that thesimulations need not be executed during the viva and the results are readilyavailable. For instance, after copying, your files should be similar to:•Evaluation and Deliverables•
Before attending the viva, you must upload all your .CST files as one
zipped folder through iLearn. In this step, do not include the results
folders, only the design files are required. For instance:iLearnEvaluation RubricGrade ExpectationHD
Student demonstrates excellent understanding of simulation software and
modelling processes. Command on reconfigurable design is evident and
simulation models are perfectly working. Student clearly understands the
results and confidently analyses them. Student presents a solid
argument about design choices and demonstrates excellent understanding
of modelling tools.D Student demonstrates very good understanding of
simulation software and modelling processes. Familiarity with
reconfigurable design is demonstrated and a simulation model is well
developed relative to opportunity. Student clearly understands the
results and analyses are appropriately conveyed. Student is confident
about the design choices and demonstrates fluency in modelling tools.Cr
Student demonstrates good understanding of simulation software and
modelling processes. Familiarity with reconfigurable design is
demonstrated and a simulation model is well developed relative to
opportunity. Student understands the results.P Student demonstrates
basic understanding of simulation software and modelling processes.
Familiarity with reconfigurable design is demonstrated and a simulation
model is presented, adhering to the specifications. Student is able to
interpret the results.F Student does not demonstrate understanding
of the simulation software and modelling processes. Model is flawed and
no appropriate simulation results produced. Student is not able to
interpret the results and justifications are flawed

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Do you need any assistance with this question?
Send us your paper details now
We’ll find the best professional writer for you!

 



error: Content is protected !!