The President of Tesla was really impressed by your analysis on market reactions and wants more (of course, he’ll pay you more!). He recently told…

The President of Tesla was really impressed by your analysis on market reactions and wants more (of course, he’ll pay you more!). He recently told his management team to do some research and find a fix for the autopilot system and analyze any option for a minimum five-year period.The management team has found a company that can provide an improved computer. With this improvement, the management team believes the company’s revenues will increase in the first year by $25 million, by $7 million in the second year, then by $2 million per year in years three, four and five. The charge for the improved capability will cost Tesla $100 million (including license fee) in the first year, with a flat license and maintenance fee of $10 million in years two through five. The team accounted for inflation in their figures and is very confident of the estimated costs and revenue.

The President wants you to look at these figures and advise him on a decision. Assume that Tesla’s CFO can borrow money at a rate of 5% per year, and that rate holds over the life of this project. All costs come at the end of the year.

A. Based on the data above, make a recommendation for the President of Tesla. Should he make this investment under the conditions described?

B. Does your advice change if interest rates triple to 15% because the capital markets consider Tesla very risky? If your recommendation changed, briefly describe why it changed.

C. Are there any other costs the President should consider? You don’t have to estimate these, just comment. Did the team consider everything, or could there be more? (Not looking for numbers looking for our thinking) Look at ch 1 implicit costs.

Sample Solution
In this task I will investigate manners by which evolving laws, strategies and efficient belief systems sway on social work practice and administration clients. The pressure this makes between community workers, administration clients, neighborhood specialists and government. I will concentrate on the adequacy of youngster security mediation, defending and appraisal between in the UK and contrasting it and Sweden. The British Welfare State in 1948 was affected by various arrangements and genuine case audits. The Beveridge Report distinguished ‘five shades of malice’s which were influencing the flow welfare state: need, malady, numbness, filth and inaction (Jones and Lowe, 2002). In 1945, Dennis O’Neil was a kid in care who experienced maltreatment bringing about his demise. A request was attempted known as the Curtis Committee Report (1946 refered to in Winter, 2011, p11), This concentrated on the commitment towards the youngster’s demise. The Curtis Committee Report (1946) found an enormous number of experts who were working with kids didn’t have particular work on preparing. The report found that because of absence of preparing youngsters were not put into fitting consideration, accordingly disregarding their needs. Younghusband (1947 refered to in Bamford, 2015, p.21) perceived that social work practice had constrained prepared staff on the bleeding edge, the report proposed a course, where center subjects of social work standards and practice ought to be instructed, with the choice of specialization. There was additionally bombing in which individuals speaking to the nearby authority had no association with the youngsters, it suggested that the individuals who work with the kids from the neighborhood authority ought to be increasingly similar to companions and bolster kids up to the age of 16, Curtis Committee (1946:147, p.445 refered to in Winter, 2011, p.11). This analysis of social administrations close by the report affected The Children Act 1948 (Parrott, 2003).The government’s reaction to this was to present Social Security, National Health Service, Social Services, Housing, Education and Employment (Jones and Lowe, 2002). They accepted that an assistance ought to be sans given at the purpose of conveyance, expecting to give all residents an equivalent least standard of care. This was a collectivist way to deal with dealing with the welfare condition of the nation at the time. An aggregate viewpoint sees that social issues mirror the financial condition of the nation and accepting that riches ought to be disseminated to diminish imbalances and to help individuals (Davies, 2004). This would be monetarily upheld by the presentation of tax collection on individuals that worked called National Insurance. Through giving this administration the administration was an exhibition to the open that it was assuming liability for keep up a base standard of care (Turbett et al., 2014). Consequently, these reports were the driving variable for The Children Act 1948, the primary bit of enactment which embraced working with families and perceiving social work as an expertly (Pierson, 2012). Anyway Butler and Hickman,( 2011) contends that this enactment just suggests conservation and aversion work with families. Every nearby position at that point made a youngsters official accountable for dealing with the open kid care and social work with kids. Past to The Children Act 1948 was The Poor Law (1834 refered to in Dean, 2013, p171), which had constrained guidelines with respect to kids and the obligation the state had towards minors. Presently parental obligation is shared between the guardians and nearby authority under area 33(4) Children Act 1989, however the neighborhood authority may possibly practice its capacity while defending or advancing the kid’s welfare (Brayne, Carr and Goosey, 2015). In the young people of social work there was developing worries about the covering or holes in social work (Rogowski, 2010). The arrival of the Seebohm Report (1968) expressed that social work practice had become ‘manifestation focused’ and recommended that social work offices meet up rehearsing ‘family focused’ approach (Community Care, 2005). This methodology contributed towards an age of general social laborers who rehearsed in specific territories or ‘patches’ (Sayer, 2008). This implied the social specialists would work with the entire family and work with a wide scope of human complexities (Higham, 2006). Parker, (2015) recommends the redesign of social help was actualized to attempt to set aside cash. The picture of nonexclusive social work divisions and practice would have it shortcomings presented by up to 30 youngster passings by the non-specific methodology received by nearby specialists (Community Care, 2005). This move in social work practice didn’t keep going for long as the Social Services Act 1970 presented individualized offices for grown-ups, youngsters and more established individuals, (Dickens, 2010)>GET ANSWER Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Do you need any assistance with this question?
Send us your paper details now
We’ll find the best professional writer for you!

 



error: Content is protected !!