You are a staff member for a state legislator. Many issues in your state have recently become a hot topic. The legislator has formed a committee to address some of the issues brought to them by staff. The legislator’s intention is to hear policy briefs and then implement action to begin solving some of the hot topic issues in the state. You have decided to present a policy brief on an issue that you are passionate about. You will need to prepare a short presentation to present your brief to the committee. Do the following:
Review the following to help you structure your policy brief correctly:
Write a 500-750 word policy brief that analyzes the problem you chose specifically for your state. The policy should be concise and follow the general structure of such a policy brief. At a minimum, your policy brief should contain the following:
A titleA summary of the problemAt least 3 possible solutionsStatement and explanation of the recommended solution with rationaleThe implications and benefits of the recommended policyBrief conclusionAt least 3 sources used to support claimsGraphics and/or other visual elements so it reflects the formatting of a professional policy briefPart II:
Create a presentation that briefly outlines the policy. Include your decision making process for presenting the information contained in the policy.
Use two to three scholarly resources to support your decision making process, some of the sources may be the same as sources used to support your recommendations in the policy brief.
“Racial Profiling”: Examining Implications and Solutions of Racial Profiling in the American Society Racial profiling is one of the most far from being obviously true and basic acts which restricts the act of human rights. “The world is at the post-racial time, and there is have to locate a dependable answer for the issue” (Nakamura and Peter 5). The most significant part in critical thinking is discovering the main driver and doing an investigation of its legitimacy. A few people contend that racial profiling is adequate. The freedom appreciated in certain spots and areas of the world, particularly the United States of America, has a tremendous and dynamic history where individuals needed to lose their lives for the course of accomplishing balance and reasonable treatment. The articles above concur that law authorization applies to entire humankind represented by limits of training and that nobody individual is exempt from the rules that everyone else follows. It is supported by proof that a few officials judge individuals dependent on their shading, language, and nationality. Additionally, in the instances of judgment, confusions, for example, negative ethnicity emerge. African Americans are captured more in numbers than some other network. A dark individual is multiple times bound to be erroneously sentenced than a white American. Negative ethnicity offers ascend to the show, low confidence, and low monetary improvement. Individuals ought to be permitted to make the most of their opportunity. “Arizona 1070 fills in as one of the hardest law which advances ethnicity” (Melone and Schmidt 21). In the law, the administration planned to restrain illicit outsiders. The law included hunts and record check and distinguishing proof. The law requirement officials distinguish blacks and Arabians more than the whites. The stops along the avenues are scaring and achieve isolation in the general public since each race will get a kick out of the chance to relate to the gathering which can offer them a chance to feature their abilities and fearlessness. The primary point of the paper will be to concentrate on wellsprings of racial profiling and discover answers for the examples recognized. Racial profiling meddles with the procedure of equity execution. Initially, I will “explore the occasions and issues it caused to the general public” (Shmool et al. 146). Besides, on the arrangement part, I will coordinate suggestions to the issue and some handy models which the proposals fit the most. Finally, I will close with general subtleties on the instances of racial profiling of Latino and Black Americans, the ramifications of this, and proposals on the way toward finding an answer. The variables of thought incorporate national security concerns, human rights, and laws. I will contend that racial profiling damages human rights, how they emerge and indicate ways to settling the issues. After some time, Police have been blamed for advancing racial profiling as clear in the manner they handle various suspects. “They have been accused for savage and over the top utilization of power because of racial predisposition” (Dunn 959). “For example, a minor by the name Rice, twelve years of age, was shot dead by police while playing with a toy weapon after the police confused it with a genuine firearm” (Dunn 958). “Studies demonstrate that among security powers and police, racial profiling is limitlessly famous, both outside and in the U.S” (Pundik 176). The kid referenced above is only a measurement among numerous different situations where the exploited people are essentially dark, with the officials being for the most part white. A few powers have utilized the subject ostensibly to augment rare asset viability to control wrongdoings and furthermore anticipate psychological warfare. As per Smith and Mason (75), “racial profiling began during the 1980s and 1990s with the war on drugs, for the most part focusing on some minority-possessed areas in the U.S., the profiling was significantly utilized towards the late 1990s as the essential factor for settling on choices of searching and halting”. A portion of the American people group generally influenced by this issue incorporate the Asians, African Americans, South Asians, Muslims and the Arabs. In the ongoing past, the law authorities have been blamed for executing their jobs dependent on racial inclination, denying the residents their legitimate opportunities as delighted in by the larger part networks. In spite of the fact that as expressed over, that racial profiling began with the war on drugs, it has demonstrated to be a one-sided approach towards the anxiety of crimes thus ought to be discarded. One of the principle issue with the annulment of racial profiling is the continued absence of will and capacity for the administration of the United States to draft and pass enactment which forbids profiling with a coupling impact on all law implementation organizations. “The constitution of the U.S has been all in all translated by courts as apathetic regarding, or lenient of racial profiling” (Glaser 169). Counterterrorism has likewise been found to incorporate racial profiling. Besides, some administration approaches have been blamed for persistently contributing colossally to the pervasiveness of profiling with respect to race and ethnicity. These approaches appear to be race-impartial yet obviously mysteriously limit opportunities and rights non-white individuals. Testing these approaches is troublesome and demonstrating their biased nature to the policymakers and open is troublesome. The governments have persistently empowered remarkable assaults of the minority networks, for example, the Latinos specifically. The neighborhood law requirement has additionally helped out government organizations to attack migrant networks’ work environments. Clearly, there are frequently generally high law implementation focuses in minority networks, which has affected minority over-portrayal in the American criminal equity framework. The administration has been blamed for yielding in making legitimately restricting arrangements with respect to the infringement of individuals rights and opportunities, particularly against racial profiling. It should in this manner volunteer to ensure its residents of an equivalent treatment by law implementers, with ramifications for absence of agreeing. Another approach intended to control racial profiling is the Guidance Regarding the Use of Race by Federal Law Enforcement Agencies 2003, under the Department of Justice. The approach is proposed to prohibit government law implementers from racial profiling. The special cases in the above-expressed direction advance profiling and altogether legitimize racial profiling by neighborhood and state law authorities towards individuals giving off an impression of being Arabs, Muslims or South Asians. That the direction is neither satisfactory nor compelling as it doesn’t examine profiling concerning strict connection, national birthplace or religion. “A few examinations demonstrate that racial profiling can’t viably help with securing suspects because of its establishment on racial contrasts in lawbreaking” (Banks 572). The approach does not have any requirement instruments nor determined discipline for infringement, with a special case for outskirt trustworthiness and national security. Therefore, the exemptions wind up advancing the inverse, rather than limiting the racial profiling. Over the escape clauses over, the direction just fills in as a warning and does not have any legitimate authoritative to the gatherings in question. The presentation of this direction and absence of a necessity for lawful evidence into a presumed crime has prompted an unbalanced exploitation of Arabs, Muslims and South Asians in the U.S the exploitation is practiced by means of different government-related activities which incorporate fringe stops, strict observation, FBI reconnaissance, FBI addressing, the NSEERS program, aircraft profiling just as the creation of the restricted travel backlog. Consequently, this sort of profiling has fundamentally added to the common abuses and examinations of honest individuals from the minority gatherings. The proper wellsprings of profiling can be followed back to tranquilize messenger and robber profiles which are created by the national law masters and appropriated to the neighborhood and state offices. Be that as it may, present day racial profiling is generally a result of a casual reason. “The reason is stereotyping which is a mental procedure” (Glaser 98). Generalizations are those convictions with respect to the characters of certain social classifications as characterized by race, class, sex, age, ethnicity, religion, among others. Thus, an alternate present day type of generalizations rises the race-wrongdoing generalization. This characteristic has been credited to a large portion of the presently experienced racial profiling. It is imperative to get that despite the fact that generalizations are a type of all inclusive typical human discernment, it can add to impeding and preferential choices and decisions. Certain predisposition is one reason for racial profiling and this alludes to the preferences and generalizations existing and working in people’s brains without cognizant mindfulness. The relationship of Blacks with the wrongdoing is a normally held generalization. As much as the vast majority may deny the generalization, it is common among the whites and this ought not be the situation if everybody needs to maintain vote based system and resident opportunity and rights similarly. At the point when the law implementers need to decide suspects so as to warrant examinations, they work under some vulnerability. That when settling on choices in vulnerability, we are slanted to utilize psychological alternate ways. Therefore, stops of the minority bunches have been less profitable comparative with those of whites. “9 out of the reported 10 deadly shootings of police who are enjoying some downtime by the on-obligation partners were dark or Latino, over the most recent 30 years” (Glaser 126). The measurement is stressing in light of the fact that American minorities just make up about a fourth of the American cops. Thus, the endeavors to simply stop this sort of profiling are insufficient. Studies have contended that racial profiling has the capability of expanding wrongdoing rates. “Another reason for the continued racial profiling is resource relinquishment” (Jim and Matthew 177). Laws exist in the U.S that enable the police to hold onto properties of medication managing>GET ANSWER Let’s block ads! (Why?)