Part 1At the end of chapter 10 on Concealment and Disclosure there is a case involving divided loyalties related todisclosure and concealment. Below is the text of that case:Gail works as an auditor for a national accounting firm. One of her clients, Alias Manufacturing Corporation(AMC), has performed well on the stock market for five years. During her audit, however, Gail discovers thatAMC has unintentionally underreported some of its liabilities and is about to be hit with a major class-actionlawsuit. She projects that AMC stock values may fall by as much as 35 percent within the next six months. Oneweekend, Gail drives home to visit her aging parents. As their only child, she feels particularly responsible fortheir well-being. Stuck in the lower middle class on a fixed income, they are very excited to inform theirdaughter that they have recently invested half of their retirement funds in AMC. Stunned, Gail ponders what todo next.There will be no outside citations required. This will be mainly your opinion, but do try and post a carefully
considered opinion. It is definitely a dilemma.
Part 2Watch the online lecture about HealthSouth, read the two articles posted and then do the following:
Do some online research about Richard Scrushy. Based upon your research (and cite at least one source),what type of culture do you believe he set up at HealthSouth? Even though he was found not guilty on allcounts, do you believe he directed the fraud as claimed by his CFOs? Why or why not? What do you see inhim that makes him you believe him or not believe him?Weston Smith claimed that Scrushy had an explosive temper and managed his executives by intimidation.How do you believe you would respond to a boss like that? Explain why you answered the way you did. Canyou think of any guidance from scripture that would be applicable if you found yourself in that type of situation(this is not a yes or no question; I want you to look for such guidance).https://www.cfo.com/fraud/2017/03/two-cfos-tell-tale-fraud-healthsouth/https://www.fraud-magazine.com/article.aspx?id=4294968446Preferred language style Simple (Easy vocabulary, simple grammar constructions)
On December 20, 1977, under the pressure of consistent police observation and examination, Gacy admits to more than 30 killings and advises his legal counselor and companion where the bodies were covered, both in the creep space and the stream. 26 casualties were found in the slither space and 4 in the waterway. Gacy is captured, indicted for 33 homicides, and condemned to death by deadly infusion. He endeavored a craziness supplication however was denied, and was executed on May 10, 1994. There were a few scientific pointers that examiners used to attach Gacy to the homicides. A portion of these include fiber examination, dental and radiology records, utilizing the deterioration procedure of the human body, and facial recreation in recognizing the people in question. Specialists discovered filaments that took after human hair in both Gacy’s vehicle and close to the slither space where the bodies were covered. Notwithstanding these hair tests, examiners additionally discovered filaments that contained hints of Gacy’s blood and semen in a similar region. Blood having a place with the casualties was found on a portion of the filaments, which would later legitimately attach Gacy to the wrongdoings. The filaments in Gacy’s vehicle were broke down by scientific researchers and coordinated Piest’s hair tests. Besides, the pursuit hounds that discovered that Piest had been in Gacy’s vehicle demonstrated this by a “passing response”, which told agents that Piest’s dead body had been within Gacy’s vehicle. Out of Gacy’s 33 known casualties, just 25 were ever indisputably recognized. Huge numbers of Gacy’s casualties had comparative physical depictions and were in this way difficult to distinguish by simply asking the general population. To recognize the people in question, specialists went to Betty Pat Gatliff, a pioneer in criminological science and facial remaking. Facial reproduction is the way toward reproducing the facial highlights of a person by utilizing their remaining parts. Certain facial highlights, for example, facial structures, nasal structure, and generally speaking face shape can be helpful in recognizing a casualty even long in the afterlife. By utilizing these highlights, and with the assistance of program, legal agents can make a picture of an individual’s face, which is instrumental in distinguishing casualties after their bodies have rotted. Facial reproduction should be possible in a few measurements. Two-dimensional facial reproductions is utilized with skull radiographs and depend on pre-passing photos and data. Nonetheless, this isn’t really perfect in light of the fact that cranial highlights are not constantly unmistakable or at the correct scale (Downing). So as to get a practical and increasingly precise delineation of the casualty’s face, a craftsman and a scientific anthropologist are generally vital (Downing). Three-dimensional facial remaking is finished by figures or high goals, three-dimensional pictures. PC programs can make facial reproductions by controlling examined photos of the remaining parts and use approximations to reproduce facial highlights. These will in general produce results that don’t look fake (Reichs and Craig 491). Some of the time, examiners will utilize a strategy called superimposition as a system for facial reproduction. Shockingly, it’s anything but a regularly utilized strategy, as it expects examiners to have some information about the character of the remaining parts they are managing. By superimposing a photo of a person over the skeletal remains, specialists can check whether the facial highlights line up with the anatomical highlights, permitting them to recognize a casualty. On account of John Wayne Gacy’s casualties, specialists had the option to utilize facial reproduction to recognize nine of the bodies found in the creep space. The accompanying realistic shows the facial recreations of these nine casualties: Since facial remaking was insufficient to distinguish the entirety of the people in question, specialists got DNA profiles from every one of the unidentified casualties and effectively searched out DNA tests from guys over the United States who had been accounted for missing somewhere in the range of 1970 and 1979 (Cook County Sheriff’s Office 3).>GET ANSWER Let’s block ads! (Why?)