It all started with a sheep named Dolly. In the mid-1990s, scientists proved convincingly that after decades of trying, we could, indeed, clone mammals —…

It all started with a sheep named Dolly. In the mid-1990s, scientists proved convincingly that after decades of trying, we could, indeed, clone mammals — and even possibly, human beings. Unsurprisingly, this discovery was one of the most controversial of the 20th Century, and the issue of cloning continues to be just as contentious today.


Learn about cloning, starting with the Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s excellent Cloning Fact Sheet.

Cloning. National Human Genome Research Institute. Retrieved from

Then respond to these big issues throughout the week, both in your own postings and in responses to your classmates’ postings.

What are the risks and benefits of cloning?

What are some potential uses for cloning?

Could you envision using cloning technology in your own life? If so, how?

What are some of the ethical problems with cloning?

How do you feel about cloning animals? What about humans?

Should cloning be regulated? Why or why not? If so, by whom?

Sample Solution
igmund Freud was a scholar who examined the psychodynamic point of view. This kind of hypothesis is persuaded by inward powers, recollections, and clashes that an individual doesn’t know about or can not control. This recommends the conduct and character of an individual is controlled by one’s very own obviousness. There are three parts of character: ID, EGO, and SUPEREGO. The ID is the crude, sloppy inalienable piece of character that is set up during childbirth. It is worked by the delight rule, limiting agony and amplifying fulfillment. The EGO is the piece of one’s character that is levelheaded and sensible. It depends on the truth standard, limiting instructional vitality so as to keep up the security of the person. It should help incorporate a person into society. The SUPEREGO is the piece of one’s character that speaks to an individual’s heart. The part causes one recognize good and bad, as indicated by the standard in the public eye. So also, Holland’s character type portrays 6 unique kinds of characters that include: reasonable, scholarly, social, traditional, ambitious, and masterful. Sensible character is one that is rational, can take care of reasonable issues, are physically solid, and have unremarkable social abilities. Guides to fit this criteria may be ranchers, workers, and truck drivers. Scholarly character types are situated toward hypothetical and conceptual undertakings. Professions that would suit them would incorporate Math and Science. Social characters have solid verbal and relational aptitudes. Profession types to fit would incorporate educators, advocates, and working in deals. Traditional characters would incline toward profoundly organized assignments. Assistants, bank employees, and secretaries would best fit this sort. Ambitious character incorporate the individuals who are daring people, and like to assume responsibility. They would make compelling directors and solid pioneers. Last, the masterful character type is one where an individual likes to convey what needs be or herself through craftsmanship (Feldman, 2016).>GET ANSWER Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Do you need any assistance with this question?
Send us your paper details now
We’ll find the best professional writer for you!


error: Content is protected !!