‘According to 19th-century critic William Hazlitt, The Castle of Otranto ‘is, to my notion, dry, meagre and without effect… The great hand and arm which…

‘According to 19th-century critic William Hazlitt, The Castle of Otranto ‘is, to my notion, dry, meagre and without effect… The great hand and arm which are thrust into the court- yard and remain there all day long, are the pasteboard machinery of a pantomime; they shock the senses but have no purchase upon the imagination.’ Consider the validity of this critique of the novel’s effects upon the reader—and also how you might defend it from this line of attack.’

Sample Solution
the pragmatic American and the teacher of him. The Fabian Edwin R. A. Seligman had considerable impact on his thought. He often quoted Edmund Burke, the conservative thinker of British, though we cannot brand Ambedkar as conservative. Ambedkar’s notion of liberty comes close to T.H. Green. Ambedkar’s philosophy is primarily ethical, social and religious. He thoroughly explored the Indian traditions and its philosophical systems in a unique way. He developed political concepts like democracy, justice, state and rights from his understanding of Indian society and the functioning of its institutions on the moral grounds. He is very critical of the institution of caste, which influences all the spheres of individual’s life and the Indian society as a whole. He further discusses how individual is related to society and how individual’s freedom is limited by other social forces. He is critical of authoritarian Hindu social order and argued in favor of democratic society. He probed into the moral and social foundations of India and gave new meaning to the lives of disadvantaged people. His was a rationale approach. Reason plays a role in his writings and speeches. The methodology he used is very scientific rather speculative. He was influenced by the assumptions of modernity. He is well informed in many areas of Indian history, polity, culture, anthropology and philosophy. He quotes many thinkers his writings those who are influenced him. Ambedkar’s poitical philosophy and its impact on Indian society and polity with reference to man and society, state and government, nation and nationalism, democracy, socialism, security, social justice, education and emancipation of the downtrodden (Jatava.1965.34). The notion of community is central to his thinking. To say that individuals make up of society is trivial; society is always composed of classes. It may be exaggeration to assert the theory of class conflict, but the existence of definite classes in a society is a fact and an individual in a society is always a member of a class. A caste is an enclosed class. Brahmins created caste and it is extended to other servile classes. Caste is endogamous unit and also a communal unit. His political theory was premised on moral community. It was as an ideal to be realized. He was very much critical about the Hindu social order. He argues that Hinduism is not qualified to be a community. Buddhism was projected as the ideal having the value of community grounding on morality. He considers that Buddhism attempted to found society on the basis of ‘reason’ and ‘morality’ (Jatava.1965.35). Ambedkar’s conception of community is very novel. He does not confirm to either Hindu ideal com>GET ANSWER Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Do you need any assistance with this question?
Send us your paper details now
We’ll find the best professional writer for you!


error: Content is protected !!