Group Presentation – Marking Criteria

Group Presentation – Marking Criteria COIT20265 COIT13236 Fail Needs Improvement Below Expectations Meets Expectations Exceed Expectations Marker Comments Introduction It fails to meet the minimum…

Group
Presentation – Marking Criteria

COIT20265 COIT13236

Fail

Needs
Improvement

Below
Expectations

Meets
Expectations

Exceed
Expectations

Marker
Comments

Introduction

It
fails to meet the minimum standards
0
points

No
objectives of presentation. Little background information to
introduce the topic
0.50
points

Objectives
not clearly stated. General background information to introduce
the topic
1.0
points

Objectives
defined. General and relevant background information to introduce
the topic
1.5
points

Objectives
clearly defined. Topic introduced and explained in a clear and
creative manner

2.0
points

Content
Quality

It
fails to meet the minimum standards
0
points

No
relevant content directly related to the subject matter
0.75
points

Some
content relevant to the purpose of the project
1.5
points

Most
content relevant. Some topics needed more elaboration
2.25
points

All
content relevant and consistent with the purpose of the project
3.0
points

Organisation

It
fails to meet the minimum standards
0
points

There
is no logical structure to the presentation
0.75
points

Some
sections need further organisation and clarity. No transitions
1.5
points

Sections
of the presentation flow in accordance with a pattern.
Some
transitions are used
2.25
points

The
presentation flows extremely well from introduction to
conclusion. Effective transitions recap each main point.
3.0
points

Visual
Aids

It
fails to meet the minimum standards
0
points

Text
too crowded and difficult to read. Content on slide is off-topic
0.75
points

Slides
not well organised to support the speaker. Text not fully
readable. No handouts.

1.5
points

Text
is readable. Most slides are organised to support main points.
Handouts with relevant content
2.25
points

Slides
and handouts are professional. Text clear and very easy to read.
All slides support very well the main points of the presentation
3.0
points

Delivery

It
fails to meet the minimum standards
0
points

Not
well prepared. Read all from slides. Lack of engagement with
audience
0.75
points

Some
preparation and consistency. Very often, read from slides. Some
engagement with audience
1.5
points

Good
confidence. Established eye contact with audience and engagement.
2.25
points

Great
confidence. Always in control. Excellent body language.
3.0
points

Teamwork

It
fails to meet the minimum standards
0
points

Team
synchronised badly. Miscommunications and lapses throughout the
presentation.
0.50
points

Team
communicated relatively well with a few lapses in the
presentation. Some students contributed more than others.
1.0
points

Team
syncrhonised and communicated well. Some members participated
slightly more than others.
1.5
points

Team
members participated equally. Team worked very well throughout
the presentation.
2.0
points

Time
Management

It
fails to meet the minimum standards
0
points

Group
did not work well to keep the time under control. Some students
talked longer than others.
0.25
points

Group
worked well to keep the time under control. Not balanced
distribution of talking time.
0.50
points

Group
worked very well to keep the time under control. Balanced
distribution of talking time

0.75
points

Group
worked extremely well to keep the time under control. Excellent
balanced distribution of talking time

1.0
points

Conclusion
and lessons learned

It
fails to meet the minimum standards
0
points

Only
few points summarised. No lessons learned included
0.50
points

Some
major points summarised. Few relevant lessons learned included
1.0
points

Major
points summarised very well. Relevant lessons learned included
1.5
points

Presentation
ends with a strong, clear and concise conclusion. Relevant and
clear lessons learned included
2.0
points

Grammar,
syntax, and references

It
fails to meet the minimum standards
0
points

It
is rare the use of appropriate sentence structure, grammar,
punctuation, citation style, and spelling in this assignment.

0.25
points

There
are some issues with the proper use of sentence structure,
grammar, punctuation, citation style, and spelling

0.5
points

The
sentence structure and grammar used is generally very good, but
there are some lapses in punctuation, citation style, and
spelling.

0.75
points

Sentence
structure and grammar excellent; correct use of punctuation and
citation style; and no spelling mistakes.

1.0
point

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Do you need any assistance with this question?
Send us your paper details now
We’ll find the best professional writer for you!

 



error: Content is protected !!