Human Capital and WeaveTech: High Performance Change

1) thoroughness/comprehensiveness of your analysis of the case; 2) quality and rigor of yourexplanation of the key issues (i.e. specificity, situated in context, integration of…

1) thoroughness/comprehensiveness of your analysis of the case; 2) quality and rigor of yourexplanation of the key issues (i.e. specificity, situated in context, integration of prior conceptsand theories); and 3) clarity in your communication/slides/Q & A (i.e. coherent, logical,organized):a) Describe the organization and its history, the industry or industry segment in which itoperates, what type of products or services are produced or sold, which region in theUS/World it operates, the vision, mission, values, and business strategy (50 points).

b) Discuss whether and how human capital enables/limits the organization inmaintaining its competitiveness. For example, discuss any unique advantages,strengths and weaknesses, and any characteristics that differentiate their humancapital from those of competitors (50 points).

c) Identify and discuss one human capital-related issue faced by the organization.Explain the exact nature of the issue. Include information about relevantoccupations/job categories, functional/dysfunctional management policies andpractices, and relevant aspects of the organizational culture. Incorporate theory andconcepts from previous academic courses in human capital and society or the currentcourse in explaining the human capital issues and their implications (50 points).

d) Discuss the potential solution to the human capital issue that is suggested in the casestudy and provide your analysis of whether this is an appropriate solution and why. Ifno solution is provided in the case, propose your own solution to the issue and beprepared to explain how/why it would work. Incorporate theory and concepts fromprevious academic courses in Human Capital & Society or the current course inexplaining how to solve the human capital challenges faced (50 points).

e) Briefly compare the organization with other organizations in which you havepreviously been or are currently a member of, or other organizations that we havediscussed in class, and explain why there may be differences/similarities in the humancapital issue faced and the potential solution to this issue (50 points).Your presentation should take 20 minutes. The class and I will then have time to ask you a few brief questions.

Sample Solution
The nature versus support discussion is probably the most seasoned issue inside brain research. Nature alludes to elements, for example, qualities and heredity that impact one’s conduct. Support alludes to all the natural attributes that effect who we are, including our youth encounters, how we were raised and the way of life we were brought up in. A few rationalists, for example, Plato and Descartes accepted that specific things are intrinsic or that they happen normally paying little respect to natural factors. Them two proposed that human qualities are from development and individual contrasts are because of a one of a kind change in one’s hereditary code. Other surely understood savants, for example, John Locke had confidence in something known as the clean slate, which is the conviction that the brain is a clear record during childbirth and how you think originates from your scholarly encounters all through life. From this point of view, mental qualities and conduct contrasts that show up through adolescence are an aftereffect of learning. In the play Macbeth, Shakespeare shows that in spite of the outer variables that impact Macbeth’s awful choices, it’s Macbeth’s own character blemishes that lead to his ruin. Despite the effect of others, Macbeth’s aspiration was the biggest factor which added to him carrying out violations, and at last prompting his defeat. Nonetheless, Macbeth’s desire was not a quality that was passed down from past ages, he obtained the attribute after he got the witches three predictions in act 1 scene 3. Once in a while, as identified with the nature versus sustain banter, character characteristics are acquired additional time because of certain natural elements. It was not until Macbeth taken in of his predictions from the witches that he got yearning. The witches hail Macbeth as Thane of Glamis, at that point Thane of Cawdor and in the long run ruler. The initial two predictions accompany no exertion. “On the off chance that change will make them ruler, why change may crown me.” Macbeth was named Thane of Cawdor for his accomplishments on the front line. Macbeth was endeavoring so difficult to become lord that he disregarded his ethics. Once in a while, individuals turned out to be so enveloped with something they need that they overlook what is directly based on what’s up. For this situation, Macbeth did whatever he expected to do to become lord. So as to become lord, Macbeth needed to perpetrate murders and pointless wrongdoings, all since he needed the power. The quality of desire identifies with sustain as opposed to nature. Since Macbeth was not brought into the world aspiring, it doesn’t bode well to state that he is aggressive simply because of heredity. Macbeth is headed to act it might be said that will in the end name him lord, hence his character is constrained by sustain, meaning that how Macbeth thinks originates from his educated encounters (his predictions from the witch). The homicide of King Duncan was one of the most essential violations submitted by Macbeth. Macbeth was driven by outer variables to kill King Duncan. He submits murder since it is the main way he could become lord. Macbeth was headed to murder Duncan by his plenitude of aspiration and his better half. Woman Macbeth disclosed to Macbeth that the main way he would have the option to become ruler is in the event that he murdered King Duncan. In scene 2 Lady Macbeth stated, “What mammoth was’t then that made you break this venture to me?” (Shakespeare pg. 55) Lady Macbeth says this to Macbeth to blame him for slaughtering Duncan. Since Macbeth is loaded with desire, this was a hazard he was eager to take. Macbeth medicated the two monitors before Duncan’s room entryway. When the watchmen were passed out, Macbeth strolled into Duncan’s room and executed him with a knife. Macbeth was not brought into the world realizing that he was going to wind up slaughtering Duncan so as to become lord. He just acknowledged after the witches conversed with him that he would need to murder to pick up the royal position. On the off chance that this was identified with the nature hypothesis, he would be brought into the world along these lines. It isn’t care for Macbeth had a genuine mental issue an incredible entirety. Macbeth killed King Duncan when he understood that it was his solitary alternative on the off chance that he needed to become ruler. At times, we accomplish insane things to get what we need (despite the fact that it ought to never get that insane). Human instinct ought not be administered with regards to Macbeth’s destruction. As people, we endeavor to get as incredible as possible. The greater prevalence we acquire, the happier we are. Macbeth is so centered around being the best that his intuition disclose to him he should do whatever he needs to do to become ruler. In brain research, there is something known as the impetus hypothesis of inspiration. The motivator hypothesis is one of the significant speculations that recommends conduct is roused by want for support. Every individual is brought into the world with senses which drive them to achieve an objective. It is evident that Macbeth’s impulses are what lead him to arrive at his objective of turning out to be above all else. It is reasonable why individuals consider Macbeth’s to be as identified with nature. Each human is brought into the world with impulses. We are brought into the world with inspiration to succeed and achieve objectives, accordingly, causing this to relate to the nature side of the discussion instead of sustain. Since nature alludes to components, for example, qualities and heredity that impact one’s conduct, it is nature to feel regretful subsequent to carrying out a wrongdoing. Following Macbeth executes King Duncan, he knows immediately that what he did wasn’t right. A surge of blame assumes control over Macbeth and he discusses how he feels so repentant to the point where he can’t rest around evening time. Toward the start of act three, Macbeth is allowed three new predictions from the witches. Macbeth gives these new predictions a chance to direct his life simply like he recently did with the first three predictions in act one. Later on, in act 4, Macbeth has a fantasy that Banquo’s child executes him. Macbeth gives indications of neurosis which shows that people feel remorseful and start to give their feelings a chance to defeat them. The witches anticipated that Banquo won’t be above all else, yet he will father a line of rulers. Macbeth felt undermined by this and the possibility of anybody however him being the best was inadmissible. Stressed over the expectation engrossed Macbeth and this is the thing that prompted his ruin. Rather than considering what a fruitful ruler needs to do, Macbeth invests the entirety of his energy stressing over who may assume control over the royal position. It is in Macbeth’s temperament to stress over being toppled because of the way that it took such a great amount for him to be King. John Locke’s concept of the brain being a clear record during childbirth is obvious in Macbeth since the greater part of Macbeth’s thought processes are because of his desire to turning out to be the best. Woman Macbeth is one of the most supporting characters. She is a significant impact on Macbeth’s choices. From the outset Macbeth believes that he will be delegated lord by some coincidence. Woman Macbeth says to him, on the off chance that you will be best, you have to man up. From the earliest starting point, she doesn’t imagine that Macbeth will be an amazing pioneer since he doesn’t have the guts. She says that so as to become ruler you need to slaughter Duncan. The best way to become lord was to dispose of the present one. Macbeth obliges this arrangement for some time and later stops and contemplates whether the arrangement truly is a smart thought. Woman Macbeth begins to discuss his masculinity and says that he needs to man up and do what he said he would. “What monster was ‘t, at that point, that made you break this endeavor to me? At the point when you durst do it, at that point you were a man; and to be more than what you were, you would be a lot more the man. Nor time nor spot did then follow, but then you would make both. They have made themselves, and that their wellness presently unmakes you.” (Shakespeare pg. 43) Lady Macbeth is essentially saying, in the event that you weren’t a man, what were you when you revealed to me you would murder King Duncan in any case? She feel that if Macbeth goes above and beyond by doing what he set out to do previously, he’ll be substantially more the man. It’s anything but an unexpected when Macbeth is executed in Shakespeare’s appalling Macbeth, since he is so inclined to debacle. The crowd is stunned when they understand that Macbeth’s destruction isn’t just because of the supporting of Lady Macbeth and the witches however to his own human instinct. The dubious nature versus support discussion has gotten one of the most concentrated philosophical questions. Realize that it isn’t really nature or support that make us what our identity is, yet both. In Macbeth it is very clear that Macbeth has his own human instinct and convictions while as yet being supported by the witches and Lady Macbeth. Macbeth’s desire is legitimately identified with the predictions given to him in act 1. All logicians and clinicians have an explanation behind saying that they accept the nature side over the support side or the other way around. A few people are conceived how they are because of a long queue on that attribute in heredity, for instance perhaps somebody with a mental issue have it since it was passed down to the from a past age. Then again, you could state that the individual had the mental issue since they were brought up in a terrible situation, with battling guardians in a downtown. These are commitments to somebody’s character attributes however they don’t make it up completely. Macbeth’s defeat is because of both nature and support similarly.>GET ANSWER Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Do you need any assistance with this question?
Send us your paper details now
We’ll find the best professional writer for you!


error: Content is protected !!