Leading and managing health care professionals

The process of leading and managing health care professionals is challenging at all times. One can argue the recent concerns that many have about the…

The process of leading and managing health care professionals is challenging at all times. One can argue the recent concerns that many have about the high cost, poor quality/ outcomes vs other countries, and the lack of access has added to the pressure and challenges. Managers and leaders in health care are faced with the problem of keeping employees motivated and finding a way to make major changes to address cost, quality, and access problems. Given this environment, a. what are the different leadership styles that one might employ in this challenging industry? Is there one approach to managing or leading that should be employed? What might a “great” manager do to manage the changes needed and keep employees engaged and motivated?

Sample Solution
The Marx Brothers’ film Duck Soup was first discharged in 1933. From the outset, numerous pundits regarded the film to be a business disappointment since its fame could not hope to compare to other Marx Brothers’ preparations like The Cocoanuts, Animal Crackers, and The House That Shadows Built. Moreover, numerous touchy American crowds were outraged at the wild “political irreverence, horseplay and pessimism” during a period of political and monetary emergency in the U.S. (Dirks). All things considered, different Americans pleased at the Marx Brothers’ keen parody and cunning portrayal of American convictions and demeanors during the time. The film makes jokes about the American framework, brings up the craziness of an ineffectual government, and uncovers the technicality of patriotism—all of which reflect normal American mentalities during the 1930s. At the point when the film was discharged, the Depression was in its severest stage and the American states of living had arrived at their most noticeably terrible. The joblessness rate soar while bread lines extended for a few squares in numerous American urban communities. The Americans were sick of President Hoover’s difficult emphasis on a free enterprise economy—which was unmistakably not working at the time. As Hoover’s term approached its end, numerous Americans started to question the American framework. Abhorrence for Hoover’s grandiose strategies was clear in the Election of 1932 in which Hoover was vanquished 59 to 472 Electoral votes (“Chapter 36”). In Duck Soup, Rufus T. Firefly’s absurdly clumsy government speaks to the insufficient government framework under Hoover that was disdained by such huge numbers of Americans during the time. The “bureau scene” in which the preposterousness of the Freedonian government was uncovered had evident ramifications to the Hoover organization and hit a positive harmony with the American crowd which was sick of Hoover’s anticipated tricks. Firefly exhibited no worry for the individuals of Freedonia over the span of the motion picture—similarly as Hoover had no worry for the individuals of America throughout his term. During the Hoover organization, Americans felt dismissed, overlooked, and abused by their administration; they felt that the administration was doing its absolute best to serve its own advantages with outright negligence to the situation of the regular individual. To many perplexed Americans, Firefly spoke to the rule blemishes in the American framework—to be specific the powerlessness to work viably and serve the individuals notwithstanding a money related emergency like the Great Depression. In spite of the fact that the film was composed before President Franklin D. Roosevelt got down to business, it regardless had significant ramifications to his organization. During the mid-to late-1930s Roosevelt was battling against the rising intensity of Hitler in Germany, Mussolini in Italy, and the endless other extremist states designed during this decade. Roosevelt’s endeavors at revitalizing American help for contribution in European issues so as to stop the threatening Nazi war machine were met with severe restriction by most of Americans. Decided independents—most of Americans were neutralist at the time—were helped to remember the purposeful publicity scattered by the legislature before the beginning of World War I and were resolved to avoid another European clash no matter what. Duck Soup brought up the regularly trifling purposes behind war during the Trentino-Firefly scenes (Dirks). The war among Sylvania and Freedonia was begun in light of the fact that Trentino alluded to Firefly as an “upstart” (Uhlin). The destitute Americans were in no mind-set to be hauled into an insignificant war by their excessively energetic President during this desperate time. One especially hostile statement spoken by Firefly had an enduring effect on numerous American crowds, at the same time insulting them and opening their eyes to the “craftiness” of the Roosevelt organization—and U.S. government as a rule: “And recall, while you’re out there gambling life and appendage through shot and shell, we’ll be in here reasoning what a sucker you are!” This statement speaks to the prevailing American mentality during the late-1930s—to be specific, that Americans ought to overlook the fundamentalist risk introduced by Hitler and Mussolini and spotlight on the more appropriate issues at home like joblessness, movement, and bigotry. As a great film satire, Duck Soup not just prevailing at uncovering American frames of mind during the 1930s however set a trend for future comedies and generated various spoofs. As researchers of U.S. history, it is critical to perceive the inconspicuous political messages hidden inside the film that can show us important exercises the job of government in the public arena—even today.>GET ANSWER Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Do you need any assistance with this question?
Send us your paper details now
We’ll find the best professional writer for you!


error: Content is protected !!