Select and view one movie from the list provided in this week’s resources below. Begin to conceptualize the couple’s or family’s problem through your theoretical…

Select and view one movie from the list provided in this week’s resources below. Begin to conceptualize the couple’s or family’s problem through your theoretical orientation, and identify interventions that you might use. Finally, begin to locate articles in the Walden Library that could be used to justify the interventions you selected.

Gilbert, B. (Producer), & Rydell, M. (Director). (1981). On golden pond [Motion picture]. United States: IPC Films.Demme, J., Armian, N., & Platt, M. (Producers), & Demme, J. (Director). (2008). Rachel getting married [Motion picture]. United States: Sony Pictures Classics.Schwary, R. (Producer), & Redford, R. (Director). (1980). Ordinary people [Motion picture]. United States: Paramount Pictures.Fischoff, R., & Jaffe, S. (Producers), & Benton, R. (Director). (1979). Kramer vs. Kramer [Motion picture]. . United States: Columbia Pictures.Pratt, C. (Producer), & Carlino, L. J. (Director). (1979). The great Santini [Motion picture]. United States: Warner Bros. & Orion Pictures.

The Assignment (2–3 pages)• Identify the movie you selected and the life transition and developmental issue present in the couple or family.• Conceptualize the couple’s or family’s problem through your chosen theoretical orientation.• Design a treatment plan including short- and long-term goals.• Explain two evidence-based interventions you would use to address these couple’s or family’s issues and how you would use them.

Sample Solution
All through the discussion happening between Socrates (Plato) and the little gathering of critics, he is obviously utilizing logic discourse. Socrates prompts every skeptic with a progression of inquiries and answers and it becomes apparent that they each have contrasting perspectives on talk. Gorgias clarifies the idea of talk as a fine art and he characterizes talk as a methods for impact and influence. He additionally utilizes analogies to help his cases and proceeds to clarify how ground-breaking talk is (p.67a), and how it tends to be utilized for equity by made a decision in the official courtroom (p.64b). Polus goes to Gorgias’ barrier and perspectives talk as a methods for influence and accomplishing extraordinary influence and riches (p.70a). With respect to Callicles, he induces that the idea of talk is a methods for getting power and the savvy individuals managing over the uneducated masses (p.84b). He has a political view on talk and furthermore expect the crowd has restricted insight and will be effectively convinced (p. 87b). Callicles is the direct opposite of Socrates and would be considered for instance of utilizing talk for malicious (p. 88b). Despite what might be expected, Socrates portrays the idea of talk as a “made craftsmanship” and a type of bootlicking. He characterizes talk as a habitude and alludes to it as low methods for double dealing (p.71a). There are particular contrasts among talk and logic clarified in Plato’s Gorgias. Socrates deduces that 1) rationalization is a conversation by “interchange question and answer” (p. 62b). Despite what might be expected, talk would be alluded to as a protracted style of discourse. All through the conversation, Socrates prompts every Sophist with arrangement of inquiries while they react with short answers. Socrates clarifies that Polus’ nullification is very useless and “… one gathering should disprove the other [… ] while the adversary produces one or none” (p. 76b). Another distinction is that 2) logic utilizes an intelligent procedure of thinking by talking about clashing plans to arrive at an agreement of truth, though talk is a maker of influence for masses to acknowledge a plausible truth (p. 70b). Socrates likewise construes that 3) talk adulterates the spirit of the rhetor, while logic thinks about the spirit of the rhetor (p. 82a-b). As indicated by Socrates, talk bids more to feeling instead of the “discerning piece of the spirit”. Socrates specifies that talk isn’t a type of workmanship and it is a habitude that produces satisfaction (p. 70b). The distinction between unadulterated fact of the matter and relative truth is that essential truth is in every case genuine regardless of the conditions, while relative truth is just valid in specific situations. Skeptics’ view on truth is that people can’t acquire essential fact of the matter (p. 85a). The Sophists have demonstrated that people are not equipped for being totally objective. Socrates accepted that Sophists utilization of talk prompted an abstract truth that was misdirecting. Socrates accepted argument brought unadulterated fact of the matter and it exists using discourse. He accepted inquiry and answer enables the devotees’ to land at unadulterated fact of the matter, or an agreement (p. 86b). The closeness that exist between their convictions is that reality exists, however they obviously have alternate points of view on truth>GET ANSWER Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Do you need any assistance with this question?
Send us your paper details now
We’ll find the best professional writer for you!

 



error: Content is protected !!