Make a review of the selected paper
First slide: Name of the paper, Journal and year.
Introduction: from the paper and also from other sources if the paper brings few information about fibers. we are not interested only about the health
benefits, if the paper talks only about it, get more information related to food technology. We are working with cereal technology, try to make a nice
introduction regarding the role of fiber in food, different quality aspects in food related to fiber.
Materials and Methods: Make it clear for the others to understand. You can also add as a flow chart. Add materials used quantities according to the
methodology and the methodology should be complete. If the methodology cites the AOAC method, please search for the method and explain.
Results and discussion: Explain the results regarding the content of fiber. If the paper brings other aspects related to sensory and quality analysis, please
add these results. Add results (graphs, tables, figures with legends) in one slide and explain the results and discussion with few texts if necessary.
At the end of Results and Discussion session, summarize the results and discussion as topics, to make it clear for everybody, like a conclusion for the
results. It will serve for questions and answers.
Conclusion: What is the authors conclusion of the paper and what did you learn from the experiments, why is this paper relevant for food technology? Do you
think the paper has any gap? Comment what do you think they should have added.
21. Music, or all the more explicitly Western Art Music, filled in as an incredible mode for the Early Christians, as it was seen as one of the “most grounded and natural powers of nature which had the ability to influence human idea and mind.”(Greek reasoning) Moreover, this view was likewise absorbed with the way of life and conventions of the congregation, in which, as should be obvious, how Christian serenades were gotten from, in any case. This gives us how they started to see music as a key idea, at the same time, whenever looked from another point of view, with no acknowledged composed framework to signify the pitch or length of a note, the scoring of music was unavoidably a disputable issue. Consequently, a Benedictine cleric named Guido d’Arezzo, whose life as a melodic researcher accommodatingly orchestrated with the Church’s necessity for melodic unification, is, when all is said in done, credited with the presentation of a fight of flat lines, by which one could precisely record the pitch of notes, subsequently starting the primary idea of composed workmanship music. The congregation had initially expected its utilization of music to be only for strict purposes, yet in any case, the real and satisfying parts of music that professed to ‘illuminate the spirit’ couldn’t be disregarded; in the long run, different types of music, from chapel music, got recognized all in all, in which old style music was roused. Anyway amazingly, the expression “old style music” initially didn’t appear until the mid-nineteenth century, trying to perceive the time from famous specialists, for example, Ludwig van Beethoven as a brilliant, or rather traditional age. Since we know about how old style music rose up out of the customs and history of Western Art music previously, we can perceive how old style music created in conspicuousness and multifaceted nature during the coming years. However, in particular, it would be very uncertain to allude the Classical time frame “all in all.” But why? About Essay Sauce Khachaturian’s life in any case, was not constantly a smooth course. In February of 1948, the Communist Party’s Central Committee, including head Andrei Zhdanov, reviled the music of Khachaturian, Shostakovich and Prokofiev – proclaiming it as formalist and hostile to Soviet. Each of the three writers had their collection excluded from execution lobbies and foundations, and had to freely apologize. This tragically affected Khachaturian, who was an energetic socialist, having formally joined the Communist Party in 1943. He reviewed, “I was squashed, decimated. I genuinely viewed as evolving callings”. Khachaturian had joined the Union of Soviet Composers as Deputy Chairman in 1937, and after two years he turned into the Deputy President of the Moscow branch. The criticism by Zhdanov was progressively a revilement of the advancement of the Union of Soviet Composers instead of Khachaturian’s music itself. The condemnation was reestablished after the expression of remorse, in spite of the fact that his melodic style remained the equivalent. Truth be told, From then on, Khachaturian turned his enthusiasm to directing and educating at the Gnessin Institute and the Moscow Conservatory. He turned into the secretary of the Composer’s Union in 1957, holding the situation until his passing. Khachaturian composed his second artful dance Spartacus, which debuted in 1956 and adequately end up being his last universally eminent work. He kicked the bucket on the first of May, 1978, and was covered at the Komitas Pantheon in Yerevan close by other Armenian learned people and specialists. Aram Khachaturian composed his violin concerto in an extremely brief timeframe. He spent the late spring of 1940 in the Ruza Composer’s Home, a stretch of cabins and stops along the Moscow River where arrangers would go to rest, work, and be loaded up with inventiveness. The work was done in around more than two months – a consequence of his exceptionally dynamic and creative psyche. Khachaturian claims “I worked with no exertion, now and again my considerations and minds outraced the hand that was covering the staffs with notes.>GET ANSWER Let’s block ads! (Why?)