Pay for Performance in America’s public schools is an extremely controversial issue. Although the process has made inroads in business and is a means to help determine promotions, pay, and retention it has not been so well received in the Public schholl systems. However, there are some successful examples where teacher pay has been linked to student test scores. In Minnesota for example, some districts have stopped giving automatic raises for seniority and base 60% of all pay increases on employee performance. In Denver, unions and school districts designed an incentive program where teachers receive bonuses for student achievement and for earning national teaching certificates. However, some plans have not worked. For example, Cincinnati teachers voted against a merit pay proposal and Philadelphia teachers gave their bonus checks to charity rather than cashing them. It appears that having teachers involved in planning the incentive system is one key factor to success. The same can be said for all incentive plans – if employees don’t buy into them, they will not work.
Questions to Research:
How could an organization measure the effectiveness of their pay-for-performance plans?From an employee’s perspective, what are the disadvantages of using a pay-for-performance plan?From an employer’s perspective, what are the disadvantages of using a pay-for-performance plan?
Tip from your Professor: How does Pay for Performance (PfP) apply to the business world. The example given is about the school system, but the discussion is to be centered around pay for performance in organizations in general, not the school system. Please note the three prompts do not have the word “school” anywhere in them. The focus is on PfP, NOT the school system.
Research Paper Instructions:
The research assignment this week is worth 20% of your final grade. The assignment is due Sunday, 11:59 PM EST and should be submitted as an MS Word attachment in either a .doc, .docx, or .rtf format. Your paper should be a minimum of eight (8) full pages of double written content work in 12 point font. In addition, include a properly formatted APA cover page, an abstract, a properly formatted Introduction and Conclusion, and a minimum of 5 references to support your ideas, arguments, and opinions. Your paper should analyze all required readings and those from your research in the field of study. You are expected to conduct outside research aside from the text to support your ideas, arguments, and opinions. Discussions of key concepts, and a critical analysis of the research is required. Remember you are to critically analyze the data you find. Merely copying pasting and citing sources does not constitute scholarly writing. You must present ideas and positions and support or refute those arguments with credible references and sources.
While assigned readings are important; you must conduct independent research of the subject matter and critically analyze the materials presented. References and sources should support your ideas, arguments, and opinions; and not be the basis of your paper. The assignment should be a scholarly paper that is designed to analyze and academically discuss what you have learned and how you can integrate the learning into an organization now and in the future. Be sure to list references in proper APA format and ensure that all listed references are also cited in text. References and citations must be congruent, meaning all listed sources are cited in text and cited sources are listed in the references section at the end of your paper.
Your paper should adhere to APA formatting requirements (APA style cover page, in-text citations for each listed reference, and a reference page are required). Please make sure to proofread carefully. Grammar and spelling errors will affect the grading. It is very important that your critical analysis relates the course content to real-world applications from your work experiences or current events affecting HRM practices.
Reminder:Late submissions will be governed in accordance with the late policy outlined in the course overview; lessons area.HRMT600 Writing Rubric100 %Exemplary4 pts Accomplished3.4 pts Developing3 pts Beginning2.6 pts Did not attempt0 ptsAbstract10 % Exemplary
Places Abstract on a separate page & clearly summarizes the intent and content of the paper in 150 – 250 wordsAccomplished
Places Abstract on a separate page & summarizes the intent and content of the paper is 150 – 250 wordsDeveloping
Abstract is vague and does not summarize the intent or content of the paper well. Paper is either less than 150 or more than 250 words.Beginning
Abstract is present but, incomplete or ambiguous. Intent of the paper is obscure and confusing.Did not attempt
Not attempted or provided.Introduction15 % Provides a clear and concise reason for the paper and background into the problem. Exemplary
Provides background research into the problem; states the problem clearly; justifies the study; explains the significance of the problem to an audience of non-specialists.Accomplished
Provides background research into the topic; describes the problem to be solved; provides findings and reasons for the research.Developing
Provides little background research into the topic; describes the problem to be solved; provides little findings and reasons for the research.Beginning
Student does not identify the purpose or provide background information for the paper. The introduction is vague and unclear in its purpose.Did not attempt
Not attempted or provided.Discussion35 % Discusses findings and conclusions in accordance with the research. Exemplary
Presents precise and orderly explanation of findings in conjunction with the research despite personal opinions and ideas. Provides at least the minimum written content in accordance with assignment instructions.Accomplished
Presents explanation of findings and research. Provides at least the minimum written content in accordance with assignment instructions.Developing
Does not address the problem statement effectively. Research does not support findings or arguments. Conclusions not clearly stated. Provides between 70% to 85% of minimum written content required.Beginning
Work is confusing and intelligble. Paper loses focus and does not address the subject matter. Rsearch is vague and confusing. Provides less than 70% of the minimum written content requirement.Did not attempt
Not attempted or provided.Summary or Conclusion15 % Articulates findings in accordance with the research. Exemplary
Restates the reason for the paper. Clearly and precisely articulates and summarizes findings and outcomes in accordance with the research; regardless of personal views or opinions.Accomplished
Restates the reason for the paper as well as articulates and summarizes findings and outcomes in accordance with the research.Developing
Attempts but does not clearly summarize the paper adequately or explain findings.Beginning
Attempts, but summary is confusing and lacks detail. Findings are unclear and lacks detail.Did not attempt
Not attempted or provided.Documentation & APA format.20 % Paper is properly in APA style writing standards Exemplary
Paper is written in proper APA format; includes at least the minimum number of references and sources; references are properly listed in the Referece section and properly cited in text.Accomplished
Paper written mostly in proper APA format. Reference listing and citations contain errors but they don’t represent a major distraction. Provides at least 60% of the references required.Developing
Student experiences difficulty with APA formatting and listing and citing sources and refererences. Provides at least 33% to 59% of required references.Beginning
Some attempt to write in APA format, however student struggles with listing and citing sources in text. Less than 33% of required references are provided.Did not attempt
No attempt to write in APA format; references and sources are not provided or not listed or cited.Grammar and Spelling5 % Submission if free of grammar and spelling errors Exemplary
This exploration is to ponder how the aptitudes and characteristics of instructors impacts on the nature of training of Primary understudies in the 21st century. An educator’s job in the 21st century has changed with expanding unpredictability and with a boundless inventory of information, a “one size fits all” approach is never again relevant. Instructors are not only liable for educating, they need to guarantee that learning has happened taking into account every kid’s needs by customizing their learning. 21st century requests a totally different arrangement of aptitudes and capabilities from youthful students and it is the duty of educators to set them up for life after school by building up these abilities. Of all 21st century aptitudes, imagination and advancement are significant and significant changes are required in the general instructive culture towards increasingly inventive learning and creative educating. The inquiry that should be addressed is, are our educators capable enough to successfully show the abilities that youthful students request in a world that is quickly developing. For this exploration work, look into researcher has examined different reports on getting ready educators and creating school pioneers for the 21st century around the globe. Specialist utilizes expressive, prescient and prescriptive research structure in which the graphic examination clarifies what has occurred, prescient clarifies what could happen dependent on past tends and designs and prescriptive investigation clarifies what should the School Leadership ought to do to guarantee that educators are well prepared for 21st century study halls. Research Scholar utilizes organized surveys and meetings. Organized survey is utilized to examine the accompanying: Attributes that instructors need to empower them to receive the structure for 21st Century Skill The individual as well as expert hindrances keeping the educators from actualizing 21st century abilities in the study hall. My exploration demonstrates that there is a requirement for a comprehensive methodology for actualizing change towards progressively imaginative learning and inventive educating and for that educator capability and further persistent expert advancement is key in planning instructors for 21st century study halls. An examination on how the aptitudes and properties of educators impacts on the nature of instruction of Primary understudies in the 21st Century. 1. Presentation Instructors around the world are embracing a plenty of changes to all the more likely plan understudies for the requests of life after school in the 21st century. Training, completely, should be re-imagined, upgraded and revamped to guarantee that understudies are prepared and ready to deal with said requests. In a quickly evolving society, understudies need to learn significant abilities for particular callings alongside learning the center subjects Maths, English, Science and Arts. Henceforth the idea of school, educator, students and educational plan should be re-imagined. Learning and instructing should change so as to address the students’ issues. This is no little challenge, and it is the duty of the instructors to ensure the change is enduring and decidedly significant. We have no clue about what the world will resemble in five years, yet we are intended to instruct for it. As an age we are right now confronting some huge scale issues, for example, an unnatural weather change, monetary change, human services, overpopulation and other natural and cultural issues. Rising advancements and coming about globalization likewise give boundless potential outcomes to existing disclosures and improvements. Is a “decent school” for our present society likewise a “decent school” for those essential understudies who will possess basic leadership jobs in the year 2030 and past? What are the aptitudes that the essential understudies of today, who will graduate in 2030 and past, request in this quickly evolving world? In past age, understudies relied upon instructors for access to information. In any case, with computerized data and calculations accessible at the speed of light, understudies have, the world, however the universe readily available. The move in the Bloom’s Taxonomy from the base up is never again a proposal, however a need. On the top finish of the scientific categorization, imagination and development, have been perceived as an important advance towards fathoming employability, which thus thinks about individual and cultural issues. This inventiveness and development should be intentionally and efficiently meshed into the educational program enabling understudies to completely convey what needs be through all center subjects, not simply restricting to Arts. Before, a ‘one size fits all’ model, institutionalization and conventional pedantic showing was sufficient, yet today educators are required to customize learning dependent on their learning styles which are being surveyed utilizing devices like various knowledge mapping and global seat mark appraisal information; taking figuring out how to the student in manners that enable understudies to learn in manners that are generally adding to their advancement. So as to guarantee powerful and ideal encouraging utilizing computerized assets and frameworks to follow understudy progress and learning, instructors need to accomplish aptitudes in innovation and recognize the contrasts between figuring out how to utilize innovation and utilizing innovation for learning. At the point when the job of an instructor is re-imagined and the training frameworks puts a lot more noteworthy accentuation on engaging youthful students to become long lasting students, to oversee multifaceted perspectives and creative methods for handling worldwide issues, understudies flourish and prosper. Understudies, themselves, should be able to do continually adjusting to consistently evolving circumstances, yet in addition want to learn and develop. These progressions have sweeping ramifications for instructors. How prepared our educators are to set up the understudies for life after school and what capabilities do instructors need, to educate viably those abilities? What is the job of educators in driving development, both inside and outside the study hall? To respond to these inquiries, government and school pioneers need to rethink the accompanying: Checking on and amending instructor training program Proceeding with proficient advancement and estimating the effect in exercises to assist educators with engaging a 21st century study hall. The nature of enrolling frameworks Execution the board framework Putting resources into making learning networks who work together constantly inside schools and systems that are learning associations to share best practices. Educators’ workplace The financial aspects of educator organic market. The job of the showing calling in driving advancement, both inside and outside the homeroom. Instructor Licensing Economic wellbeing Change of administration profile of school pioneers is definitely not a decision; it is a need or rather a characteristic outcome. Schools pioneers of 21st century need to locate the correct harmony between authority in driving learning, organization and the board in that capacity, is a functioning facilitator of progress. 21st century instructive pioneers, and the school as an association, always need to pose the inquiry “Would we say we are meeting the adapting needs of understudies inside our continually evolving world?” 2. Writing Review We realize that what’s to come is more eccentric than any other time in recent memory and learning encounters today can best assist understudies with coping up with the incomplete and live with vulnerabilities. Per Dalin (1998) Julie A.S (1999) unmistakably clarifies that new instructor influential positions are rising as instructors and approach producers look to improve the three significant periods of the showing vocation continuum: Teacher planning, acceptance and progressing proficient advancement. It is a regularly cited articulation that the nature of any instruction framework is essentially reliant on the nature of instructors in their very own framework (Barber and Mourshed, 2007). In the 21st century, educator demonstrable skill that guarantees the nature of instructors requests a lot of specific information and abilities (Darling-Hammond, 2010). Be that as it may, this subtleties just two of the difficulties. Planning kids for the obscure future requires getting ready educators utilizing instructor training projects to confront openings and difficulties that accompany it (Goodwin, 2015). Moorman and Nusche (2007) depicts the expanded requirement for adaptability to adjust the educational plan and study hall guidance to address singular issues places more prominent requests on educators’ instructive capability. A collection of writing recommends instructor training educational plans need to mirror the changing needs of the educational system. The cutting edge proficient job includes an all-inclusive arrangement of capabilities including showing an inexorably differing scope of students, values instruction, education and numeracy over the educational program, utilizing appraisal information viably, captivating in real life research and self-audit, working together in school groups (counting between office working) and coordinating innovation adequately. Crocker and Dibbon (2008) Finnish Institute for Educational Research, 2009; Calder and Grieve (2004). As is valid for most instructor training programs far and wide, the educating practicum is one of the key parts for planning new educators. This includes applying the skill, obtained from the instructor training courses, in a genuine study hall. For a successful educator training course, soundness between the courses and instructing practicum or clinical practice is fundamental. Harris (2011) McKinsey (2010) As instructors are vital to the nature of any training framework, educator instruction programs that seek to create 21st century instructor polished methodology among its alumni should be conscious of the requirement for a 21st century educational plan which is interdisciplinary, venture based, look into driven, associated with the network and synergistic, grasps innovation, credible evaluations and administration learning, and sustains higher request thinking aptitudes, various insights and 21st century proficiency Lim.K.M (2013) Plant specialist. H (2005) further clarifies all huma>GET ANSWER Let’s block ads! (Why?)