Part 1: Zulu morphology. Identify rules governing derivational and inflectional morphology in Zulu using linguistic data. Your task is to answer all the components of…

Part 1: Zulu morphology. Identify rules governing derivational and inflectional morphology in Zulu using linguistic data. Your task is to answer all the components of Exercise 5 in Chapter 3 of ITL 10th or Chapter 2 of ITL 11th. I’ve attached the question below to avoid any confusion.

Part 2: Wordsmithing. (a) Create a word that fills a lexical gap. (b) Identify the part of speech. (c) Identify the mechanism used to create this new word (e.g., blend, acronym, etc.). (d) Use it in a sentence. To get full credit your word must be unique. If your word appears in a google search, you will not get full credit. And, in addition to satisfying criteria a-e listed above, the meaning of the novel word must be instantly recognizable. For example, “immensify”, would be universally recognized as meaning, “to make immense or increase in importance, size or magnitude.”

Sample Solution
n the Federalist Papers, Number Seventy, distributed March Fifteenth, 1788, Alexander Hamilton stated, “A weak Executive infers a weak execution of the legislature. A weak execution is nevertheless another expression for an awful execution; and an administration not well executed, whatever it might be in principle, must be, by and by, a terrible government.” He contended that a solitary official, instead of an official board, would be an obviously better decision. He realized that it would be the most ideal approach. At the point when Hamilton composed the federalist paper number seventy, America had quite recently split away from the English government and was framing how the administration was to be organized. At the point when he said a weak official, he implied a president who didn’t have a lot of intensity and needed to impart capacity to an official chamber. He felt that a chamber of more than one official would prompt a more fragile government. Hamilton had faith in the vitality of the official, a fiery particular pioneer. He trusted it was fundamental to the network and outside assaults. He didn’t need the ability to be weakened among many. He said this would deny individuals of two protections. One being the limitation of popular sentiment: who do you consider responsible if there is more than one individual in control and one of the people accomplishes something incorrectly? In the event that there is more than one individual in the workplace and something turns out badly, individuals could point fingers on one another. On another hand, if there is one president we realize who to fault, and can expel that individual from office. He likewise believed that mystery in one individual official was satisfactory, particularly in the midst of war. In spite of the fact that students of history, for example, Arthur Schlesinger Jr. thought much in an unexpected way. He accepted that this kind of official mystery would at last lead to the ability to retain, spill, and the ability to lie. A case of this is the means by which Eisenhower shrouded CIA tasks. “The ability to retain and the ability to spill drove on unyieldingly to the ability to lie. The mystery framework ingrained in the official branch the possibility that international strategy was nobody’s the same old thing, spare its own, and the uncontrolled mystery made it simple for misleading become schedule. It was in this soul that Eisenhower hid the CIA activities it was mounting against governments around the globe.” (Khan Academy) In spite of the fact that Hamilton had the correct thought for having a solitary official as president, we can see that our progenitors were sufficiently astute to incorporate the Legislative and Judicial Branches to check and adjust their official. One case of this is the twenty-second correction, which takes into consideration close to two terms, four years each in an administration. President Franklin Delanor Roosevelt served four terms during the extraordinary sadness. As a response, on March Twenty-Fourth, 1947, Congress altered the Constitution. A subsequent model is the War Powers Act of 1973, in which Congress and the Legislative Branch casted a ballot and pondered that a president couldn’t submit the United States to>GET ANSWER Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Do you need any assistance with this question?
Send us your paper details now
We’ll find the best professional writer for you!


error: Content is protected !!