Describe how your 2, 5, and 10 year career plan may have changed since you started the RN BSN program based on future trends and opportunities identified in chosen area of focus (Nursing educator). Be sure to include at least 2 specific examples of how your behaviors, attitudes, and practices have changed and why.How have you expanded or changed your personal philosophy of nursing since you started the RN BSN program? Include insights and at least 2 specific examples of how your behaviors, attitudes, and/or practices have changed regarding role of the professional nurse as a result of the RN BSN program.Would you describe yourself as a lifelong learner? Why?
The third country equivalence regime is another highly significant regime and is especially relevant in the context of this essay. It is judged that mutual recognition and equivalent treatment talks between the European Union and the United Kingdom, in financial services, are likely to form a significant part of the political discussions and long-term planning between the two respective negotiating teams. As outlined earlier in this essay, this regime enables countries that are not members of the EU or EEA, third countries, to access elements of the single market by way of the principle of equivalence. This is provided for by some EU legal instruments, where companies domiciled in third party countries (the home country), are subjected in the home country to equivalent regulation and supervision. It is, therefore, purported by many that as Brexit will remove the opportunity to ‘passport’ from the UK’s financial services regime, third party equivalence can provide an adequate solution, which will allow financial services firms to continue with minimal disruption. This, naturally perhaps, has endeared itself to British negotiators as the preferential option for establishing future trading relations with the European Union. This is set out in Reynolds and Donegan’s journal article on the future opportunities and challenges that Brexit presents. The article clearly establishes that a great many of the EU’s sectorial legislation relating to financial services makes provision for access to EU markets and customers for financial services institutions when an equivalent regulatory regime is applied in that country. Nevertheless, crucial to our analysis of Brexit’s impact is the fact that equivalence regimes are applicable by virtue of existing EU legal instruments in many cases but not in all cases. There are further drawbacks to a devout reliance on equivalence as a solution to post-Brexit market access problems. Chief among the concerns surrounding equivalence is the fact that equivalence is a recognition that is granted unilaterally by the European Union and, furthermore, that such recognition can be revoked by the European Union with relative ease and with as little as thirty days’ notice. The status quo of the regime is, therefore, perhaps palatable to some but certainly sub-optimal. This essay advocates the position that pursuing the ‘equivalence’ regime is a viable option and one that should be extensively explored by negotiators, concurrent with an examination and exploration of ways in which the negative aspects of the ‘equivalence’ regime can be mitigated in the UK’s interests. This approach is one that has gained some traction amongst British negotiators as was reported in a Times of London article last year. T>GET ANSWER Let’s block ads! (Why?)