Choose a job-related topic of your interest. Then, in a 2–3 page analysis, research and analyze two scholarly articles that deals with your topic.
Cyberpsychology utilizes the same research methods and techniques employed within the field of psychology and other social sciences, although it brings to the forefront some special opportunities and issues. Current research into cyberpsychology topics includes basic research and applied research and utilizes the scientific method to build and test theories (Norman, 2008).
SHOW LESSBy successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 4: Evaluate the methods, procedures, and techniques useful in the conduct of empirical research within cyberpsychology.Explain the data collection methods, the participants, and the participant recruitment methods.Explain the apparatus or material used to gather research and the procedures performed to collect the data.Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of a research methodology.Competency 5: Evaluate problems, conflicts, and unresolved issues in the study of cyberpsychology through critical thinking.Investigate the range of current unresolved issues in cyberpsychology.Analyze an issue related to your career field that requires more research.ReferencesNorman, K. L. (2008). Cyberpsychology: An introduction to human–computer interaction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Competency MapCHECK YOUR PROGRESSUse this online tool to track your performance and progress through your course.Toggle DrawerContextCyberpsychology utilizes the same research methods and techniques employed within the field of psychology and other social sciences, although it brings to the forefront some special opportunities and issues. Current research into the topics of cyberpsychology includes basic research and applied research and utilizes the scientific method to build and test theories (Norman, 2008). Like other scientists, cyberpsychology scientists must “conceptualize the problem, collect research information (data), analyze the data, and draw conclusions” (Norman, 2008, p. 93). Some of the research into the study of cyberpsychology involves the testing of some of the big theories such as Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs and Bandura’s Social Learning theory, among many others.
SHOW LESSConsider the ways in which the Internet and related technologies support a social scientist’s scientific inquiry. Online surveys can be quickly and cheaply developed and disseminated to a large audience. Participants who engage in self-reported research can e-mail journal entries, receive text or e-mail prompts requesting information, et cetera. However, there are certain concerns such as issues with response rates, ethical issues of tracking users and their preferences, methodological issues of observing the use of the Internet, et cetera.
One resource you may find useful is the peer-reviewed journal Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking (which, along with many other journals, publishes research into the area of cyberpsychology), which includes some of the following topics:
Social networking on sites like Facebook, Instagram, et cetera.Virtual communities and blogging behavior.Mobile phone behavior.Online video sharing.Computer games and gaming.E-commerce and online shopping.E-health communication.Internet addiction.Cyberbullying.Epidemiological studies of the Internet use and behavior.Cyberpornography.Virtual reality therapy.ReferenceJoinson, A., McKenna, K. Y. A., Postmes, T., & Reips, U. (Eds.). (2009). The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Norman, K. L. (2008). Cyberpsychology: An introduction to human–computer interaction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Questions to ConsiderTo deepen your understanding, you are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of the business community.
For the following question, refer to the article, “How the Internet Is Changing the Implementation of Traditional Research Methods, People’s Daily Lives, and the Way in Which Developmental Scientists Conduct Research,” linked in the Resources.
What are the different ways in which social scientists can use the Internet to collect data?What are the limitations of such research?What are the ethical issues to be considered, such as privacy concerns and tracking?What is the research topic under study?What were the hypotheses?What research methodologies were utilized?Who were the participants?ReferenceDenissen, J. J. A., Neumann, L., & van Zalk, M. (2010). How the Internet is changing the implementation of traditional research methods, people’s daily lives, and the way in which developmental scientists conduct research. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34(6), 564–575ResourcesAPA ResourcesBecause this is a psychology course, you need to format this assessment according to APA guidelines. Additional resources about APA can be found in the Research Resources in the left navigation menu of your courseroom. Use the resources to guide your work as needed.
American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. This resource is available from the bookstore.APA Paper Template [DOCX].Required ResourcesCritique Template [DOC].
Suggested ResourcesThe resources provided here are optional. You may use other resources of your choice to prepare for this assessment; however, you will need to ensure that they are appropriate, credible, and valid. The PSYC-FP4210 – Cyberpsychology Library Guide can help direct your research, and the Supplemental Resources and Research Resources, both linked in your courseroom, provide additional resources to help support you.
Interpreting ResearchComplete the following Capella multimedia presentations:
The Research Cycle.Research Methodologies Comparison.Key Events in Ethical Research.Interpreting Data.Read the following from the Capella University Library:
Lazar, J., Feng, J. H., & Hochheiser, H. (2017). Research methods in human-computer interaction. Elsevier Science & Technology.Chapter 1 provides an introduction and overview to human-computer interaction (HCI) research, with some history and changes in topics and research methods over time.Chapter 15 addresses working with human subjects in HCI research.Moreno, M. A., Waite, A., Pumper, M., Colburn, T., Holm, M., & Mendoza, J. (2017). Recruiting adolescent research participants: In-person compared to social media approaches. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(1), 64–67.This article is an example of research issues and methods of recruiting participants for online research.Identifying Issues in CyberpsychologyRefer to the Assessment 2 for an extended list of topics and issues on cyberpsychology.Lazar, J., Feng, J. H., & Hochheiser, H. (2017). Research methods in human-computer interaction. Elsevier Science & Technology.Chapter 14 addresses online and ubiquitous HCI research issues.Whitty, M. T. (2016). The Study of individuals, society and digital technologies. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Individual chapters cover online relationships, online dating, online sexual activities, Internet infidelity, children’s and teens’ use of digital technologies, online education, leisure and entertainment, online gaming and gambling, online deception, online crimes: scams, fraud and illegal downloads, cyber harassment, hate crimes, cyberwarfare, child pornography and pedophilia, and online support and heath care.Locating Research in CyberpsychologyComplete the following Capella multimedia presentation:
Cyberpsychology Course Resources.Use the databases in the Capella University Library to assist your search for scholarly articles and books in the field of cyberpsychology. Several professional journals in this field are available including:
Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace.CyberPsychology and Behavior.Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking.Advances in Human-Computer Interaction.Assessment InstructionsPreparationStep 1: Choose a topicChoose a topic related to your current job (or desired career field) from the following list:
Activism.Art.Artificial intelligence.Augmented reality.Big data.Blogging or microblogging.Cloud computing.Cloud forensics.Cyberdefense.Cybertherapy.Criminal networks.Digital divide.E-commerce or consumer behavior.Embedded computation.Enterprise architecture.Enterprise analytics.Education.Energy.Entrepreneurs.Ergonomic issues.Fundraising.Hackers.Health care.H–CI (human–computer interface).Media.Mobile technology.National security.Online learning or virtual high school.Product development.Real-time analytics.Robots.Security.User customization.Step Two: ResearchResearch a topic of interest and choose two scholarly articles that examine cyberpsychology research related to your chosen career field. You may use the Capella University Library, the Internet, or any other scholarly resource to find the articles. You may also use the Interpreting Data media piece (linked in the Resources) as an aid to complete this assessment.
Note the following:
References should be mostly scholarly in nature. In other words, you should direct your research to professional psychology journals and texts, as well as current articles from the media (for example, articles from PewResearch, professional journals, and respected media).The library guide for this course will help you locate appropriate sources.Wikipedia is not a reliable source of information for this purpose. Do not use Wikipedia.InstructionsComplete the following:
Using the topic you chose in Step One, identify your job or the career in which you are interested and explain how your topic relates to the job.Using the two articles related to your chosen career or allied field that you located in Step Two, use the Critique Template, linked in the Resources under the Required Resources heading, to guide your evaluation of the methods, procedures, and techniques used in the research. Each article must be evaluated on a separate copy of the template. For each article, complete the following in the template:Explain the data collection methods.Identify the participants and participant recruitment methods.Explain the apparatus or material used to gather research, as well as the procedures performed to collect the data.Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the research methodology.Investigate the range of current unresolved issues in cyberpsychology.Using the APA Paper Template, linked in the Resources under the APA Resources heading, analyze a career-field-related issue or problem that requires more research.Additional RequirementsWritten communication: Ensure written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.Formatting: Format resources and citations according to current APA style and formatting guidelines. Use Microsoft Word.Number of pages: 2–3 double-spaced pages for the issue analysis, excluding the cover page and references, plus one Critique Template for each scholarly article reviewed,Number of resources: Use two scholarly articles.Font and font size: Use Times New Roman, 12-point font.Research Methodologies
The investigation of cognizance is hazardous and, so as to battle this, has become an interdisciplinary exertion that addresses a plenty of parts of human discernment and cerebrum work. Initially, a neurological methodology taking a gander at specific deficiencies in patients was embraced to find out about ordinary and irregular mind work. Generally, there has been an expanding enthusiasm for the investigation of positive side effects, similar to those identified with synaesthesia. The wonder of synaesthesia can basically be portrayed as an ‘association of the faculties’ (“UK Synaesthesia Association”, 2018), whereby an inducer (for example the letter An) evokes a random synaesthetic affiliation (for example the shading red). Clarifying the purpose behind and the components behind this mix of two diverse intellectual streams (Sobczak-Edmans and Sagiv, 2013) is one of the ‘difficult’ issues in cognizance explore (Chalmers, 1995), all things considered basically an emotional encounter of ‘what things feel like’. While early investigation into synaesthesia only gave documentation, later work attempts to clarify the perceptual experience of synaesthetes and think about how synaesthesia can advise recognition and cognizance all in all (for example Cohen Kadosh, Gertner and Terhune, 2012). A few scientists have caused cases for utilizing synaesthesia as a model issue to better to get awareness: for instance Gray (2005), who recommended that rather than functionalism (where there was a distinction in work, there ought to be an important contrast in understanding), in synaesthesia, two unique capacities can prompt the equivalent abstract understanding. The benefits of utilizing synaesthesia as a model issue were most adequately advanced by Sagiv and Frith (2013): they expressed that synaesthesia is phenomenologically characterized while its properties can be contemplated in detail. For instance, it is described by atypical perceptual encounters, which would then be able to be contrasted and situations where it is missing (while the abstract records of people’s cognizant experience go about as a needy variable; Baars, 2003). The perceptual experience of synaesthetes is extraordinary however its reality features a similar general issue, including how these encounters emerge and with what neural premise (Sagiv and Frith, 2013). The second element of synaesthesia that makes it a proper model issue is the enormous assortment of sub-types, proposed to be more than 80 (“Synesthesia”, 2017). These include different mixes of tangible modalities and kinds of encounters, which gives analysts an incredible number of chances to watch and test speculations of cerebrum work and related mental states. Moreover, it welcomes a discussion on singular contrasts in abstract understanding of our general surroundings. The third, most commonsense explanation that favors utilizing synaesthesia as a model issue is that synaesthetes seem to be, by and large, sound and willing examination members in contrast with utilizing neurological/neuropsychiatric patients who have perceptual variations from the norm. Synaesthesia is more typical than initially suspected – evaluated to happen in up to 5% of the populace (Sagiv and Ward, 2006) – making an enormous pool of potential members. What’s more, an audit by Luke and Terhune (2013) diagrams the ebb and flow remaining of investigation into artificially actuated synaesthesia: their discoveries expressed that serotonin agonists (Nichols, 2004) (for example LSD, mescaline) had the option to instigate synaesthesia in non-synaesthetes and upgrade it in synaesthetes (Luke et al., 2012), with sound-related visual synaesthesia the most normally artificially incited. This line of research is inadequate, be that as it may, if artificially prompted synaesthesia is found to reliably copy inborn synaesthesia, could additionally broaden open door for investigation into the neural systems supporting synaesthesia and along these lines awareness all in all. One of the zones synaesthesia has been believed to be of most an incentive as a model issue is in the investigation of the neural associates of cognizance, which can be educated by the neural relates of synaesthesia, and all the more explicitly in distinguishing the insignificant arrangements of neural instruments which, when initiated, trigger a synaesthetic encounter. It is important to separate between the neural associates of synaesthetic experience and those of consciousness of the inciting boost. Between-subjects plans give generally clear intends to a consistent improvement while looking at synaesthetes and non-synaesthetes. Notwithstanding, synaesthetes can’t be treated as one, as despite the fact that the names may be the equivalent the appearance frequently isn’t. Moreover, the comorbidity of synaesthesia with different sorts may restrict any examination. It has for some time been speculated that V4 is basic for shading vision (for example Zeki, 1990) yet so as to reason that it is basic to shading cognizance, it would need to be appeared there is no shading experience without V4. Investigations of synaesthetic shading experience show examples of V4 initiation (for example Van Leeuwen et al., 2010), which would loan believability to this hypothesis. Notwithstanding improvement in the mapping of various cortical zones’ capacities, the examples of cortical network on cognizance, cerebrum capacity and awareness, and their belongings, are not surely known. Synaesthesia offers chances to inspect these examples from another point of view, particularly thinking about the expanding enthusiasm for network in formative conditions (for example Rippon et al., 2007), also its boundless limit in illuminating the connection between mind capacity, pliancy and cognizant experience. Investigations of synaesthetes under ‘rest’ conditions (for example Tomson et al., 2013) bolster the hypothesis that adjusted system work is straightforwardly identified with changed cognizant experience. The neural corresponds of changes in these encounters can’t yet, be that as it may, clarify how physiological systems can make the encounters. The individual contrasts in the manner individuals see the world is another zone which synaesthesia research might have the option to advise. At its center, synaesthesia is about atypical experience; in Sagiv and Robinson’s (2005) examination, for synaesthete AD the letter C is yellow, though for synaesthete CP it is blue. The uniqueness in the appearance of synaesthesia can resound an old inquiry in awareness: do people concede to shading names however experience them in an unexpected way? While conduct measures have assisted with barring some potential changes of people’s shading space (Palmer, 1999a), for the most part it is difficult to exactly look at encounters. A special case is visual weakness (Palmer, 1999b), where taking a gander at the neurophysiology of tangible frameworks has given some clarification to the distinction in experience: people who have one of three sorts of cone photoreceptors missing can’t separate between hues that the commonplace populace experience as unmistakable. The preparing of data that originates from different tactile modalities isn’t just consolidated, however can likewise impact one another: a model would be the manner by which visual information (for example viewing a scene on a screen) can impact sound localisation (for example the sound is originating from entertainers’ mouths, not speakers somewhere else in the room) (Macaluso and Driver, 2005). Tactile collaborations are additionally conceivable when only one tangible methodology is invigorated, as in synaesthesia. Synaesthesia epitomizes the ends that we develop our apparent world, which isn’t a precise of the outer world. Frith (2007) expressed that recognition is a dream that happens to agree with the real world, which means observation is an inferential procedure. Inductions about the world are made dependent on best accessible info and related knowledge, yet these can not be right, bringing about perceptual fantasies (Gregory, 1980). Like the remainder of the world, synaesthetes can just investigate the world inside their faculties, in spite of their perceptual encounters being apparently more extravagant. Nearby these zones where synaesthesia and awareness research may commonly educate the other, the development of social reality, office and points of view concur and may likewise profit by utilizing synaesthesia as a model issue.>GET ANSWER Let’s block ads! (Why?)