Superior Essay Writers | Ricardo wage and profits .gradient { filter: none; } Ricardo wage and profits Arrow, K. J. 1991. Ricardo’s Works as Viewed…

Superior Essay Writers | Ricardo wage and profits

.gradient {
filter: none;

Ricardo wage and profits

Arrow, K. J. 1991. Ricardo’s Works as Viewed by Later Economists. Journal of the History of EconomicThought 13 (spring): 70-77.Hollander, S. (2000). Sraffa and the Interpretation of Ricardo: The Marxian Dimension. History of PoliticalEconomy 32(2), 187-232., E. (1998). Marx on Ricardo: an explanation of some important misunderstandings. The EuropeanJournal of the History of Economic Thought, 5(2), 276–291. doi: 10.1080/10427719800000021OutlineYour essay should focus on one of the primary economists we read in this course, e.g. Ricardo. Once youhave decided on the economist, you will need to find relevant articles in one or more of the following fourjournals: History of Political Economy (HOPE), The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought,Economics and Philosophy, and the Journal of the History of Economic Thought. Do not go to other journalsuntil you have found two suitable articles in this group of four journals. I will allow one exception, either froma different but suitable journal (i.e. in the subject area of this course), or a chapter from a recent book(monograph or edited collection). Any exceptions to the list of journals, however, must be approved.Generally, the more specific and the more recent the articles you select, the better. All of your articles ought to be published since 1990. These journals are in the UBC library holdings; if you search from home, be sure to log in first so you can browse for free. It is advisable to print out your findings at each step in your research to keep track of your findings. You are not expected in such a short time, and with no previous background to the subject of this course, to arrive at an original piece of work. Your task is to sort out adebate in the secondary literature. Rather than write a paper from scratch, aim to find three articles by scholars (experts) who have different interpretations of e.g. Ricardo on a specific question. Your paper must develop an argument as to which interpretation is the most compelling; you need to give reasons that support your judgments. Even if you find yourself in almost complete agreement with one contemporary scholar, try with as much integrity as possible to sound out the alternative points of view. You may find, in the process, that they also have some merit. You will be graded on the clarity and soundness of your argument as well as your comprehension of the material. Your essay should be well written; this usually requires several drafts. A short title for the paper will suffice and do not use footnotes. Be sure to attach your References. Because you are writing the paper for me, get right to the main argument; you can skip any general introduction. Please do not use subheadings. Your essay should flow well from start to finish;strive for one long argument. Number the pages and proofread the text. I strongly encourage you to make final corrections with a pen in hand to show that you proofread your essay.Writing Skills Tips from Professor Schabas1. Writing is about persuasion, but you are most likely to succeed if you establish an objective voice. On rare occasions, you may need to use the first person pronoun to suggest to your reader that you are asserting a more idiosyncratic position. 2. Writing can always improve,no matter how prolific and successful one becomes at the craft. Reading is a great resource; pay attention to the form as well as the content of good prose. The use of rhythm is very important, so read good prose aloud to see how the writer varies the length of sentences. Subordinate clauses serve this end as well, by implicitly ranking the ideas.3. Every sentence is precious, so avoid repetition or trivial generalizations. Start with a sentence that piques the reader’s curiosity and sets the paper in motion. 4. Verbs are the seat of motion. Most of us overuse the verbs to be and to have, but they do not impart momentum to our prose. Try for greater variety, but refrain from using a verb that you do not fully understand. It is best to use the present tense whenever possible. 5. Aim for clear, concise and precise prose. Ask yourself the following as you edit each draft: could this sentence be more precise (capture the ideas better), more concise (fewer words), and clearer (less ambiguous)? Also, check that each sentence in your essay is grammatically correct. 6. Review the use of punctuation. Avoid using colons and semi-colons and dashes. Commas, for example, usually come in pairs. It is often better to imbed adverbs or qualifiers within the sentence.7. No colloquialisms or contractions, please. “It’s” is short for “it is” and therefore should not appear in your essay. Also, it is better not to assign possession to objects or institutions. If you are tempted to write “society’s problems”, then it is better to change it to “the problems of society”. 8. Quotations are best kept to a minimum. Why quote at all?Because the passage has poetic flair or because it gives evidential support to a claim you think is in doubt.It is far better to keep the prose style in your own voice throughout, since moving back and forth can disrupt4/17/2020 Order 316476135 3/9the train of thought. Also, long quotes are usually skimmed and not read in full. Avoid them altogether. Use ellipses only within, not at the start or end of a quote. You are free to adjust the punctuation at the end and to introduce an upper/lower case letter at the start for fluency but must otherwise remain faithful to the original source. Identify that source at the end of the quote, in parentheses, in the main text (author, date,page number) and provide the full reference in your bibliography.

Sample Solution

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Do you need any assistance with this question?
Send us your paper details now
We’ll find the best professional writer for you!


error: Content is protected !!