Shared reading in early childhood programs

Question 1 Research Question 1: Does shared reading in early childhood programmes predict children’s language and literacy development? Research Question 2: What are early childhood…

Question 1

Research Question 1: Does shared reading in early childhood programmes predict children’s language and literacy development?

Research Question 2: What are early childhood teachers’ attitudes towards STEM education?

(a) Examine the paradigm you hold and the specific research method you have chosen to answer the research question. Explain why your choice of paradigm and method will best answer the research question.

(b) Locate and examine TWO (2) articles that are relevant to the research question. Create a short annotated bibliography for each article that includes the following: the sample size, research setting, participants, methods (data collection and analysis), key findings, and how the results might be relevant to the Singapore context. (15 marks)

(c) Describe how you might use TWO (2) data collection techniques to answer the research question. Explain the strengths and limitations of the techniques.

Question 2

Answer Question 2 based on the following article (GIVEN):

• Yang, W., & Li, H. (2018). A school-based fusion of East and West: A case study of modern curriculum innovations in a Chinese kindergarten. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(1), 17-37.

(a) Write a critical analysis of the article. Describe the research problem, research questions, and the type of research design used. Using your study guide and textbook (Mukherji & Albon, 2018), examine the appropriateness of the methods for addressing the research problem, and the quality of the methods and procedures. Also, discuss the extent to which the results support the conclusions as stated by the authors.

(b) Describe and compare the TWO (2) types of qualitative or quantitative research methods you might use to extend and expand on this study’s findings.

Sample Solution
Multichannel promoting offers advertisers exceptional points of interest by empowering brands to arrive at purchasers over numerous channels, assemble different source information about buyer conduct and the purchaser’s excursion, and utilize that understanding to custom-tailor focused on showcasing for singular purchasers over those equivalent channels. Consider a theoretical model wherein two brands wish to advertise weight reduction items to buyers. The primary organization, SlimChance, contributes 15% of its focused on incomes only in search promoting, thinking (accurately) that doing so will arrive at purchasers at the exact second when they are displaying acquiring enthusiasm for weight reduction items. They upgrade their site, making interests in the site’s quality, reliability, prevalence and authority, bringing about substance and a client experience that get individuals discussing the brand and connecting to the site, and in this manner improving their web index positioning. Notwithstanding SEO, they additionally put cash into paid pursuit, offering on catchphrases for advertisement arrangement at the highest point of indexed lists, and paying for every client who taps on their promotion. In the interim, SlimChance’s rival, FlabShedders, contributes roughly a similar measure of cash in a multichannel program. Notwithstanding search promoting, they spread spending across three different classifications: social showcasing, which permits them to target clients whose companions’ advantages/practices incorporate weight reduction; show, which empowers them to retarget clients who have communicated with their image by displaying “pennant” advertisements on different pages they visit; and portable promoting, which exploits the profoundly close to home nature of cell phones and uses vicinity and other information from the cell phone to introduce custom ideas to the client. For what reason does FlabShedders’ multichannel program return more prominent incentive than SlimChance’s single-channel approach? In a word, coordination. The information that FlabShedders assembles from one channel can be joined with information from different channels, yielding a progressively precise image of purchasers’ conduct. Even better, the subsequent understanding can be utilized for showcasing exercises over the entirety of the channels also, for better reach and focusing on. For instance, a client who scans for the expression “gluten free weight reduction” can be given, state, a connect to a free eBook containing FlabShedders’ sans gluten plans and the chance to follow FlabShedders’ Instagram channel for every day weight reduction tips and formula thoughts, which she acknowledges. Presently FlabShedders can introduce the clients’ companions (adherents) with offers, realizing that her companions’ advantages are more probable than normal to coordinate hers. It can likewise give her custom offers by means of Instagram and show promotions with approaches to additionally cooperate with the brand — state, by downloading the free FlabShedders portable application. At the point when she tracks her weight, looks for plans and exercise thoughts, visits different sites, makes social posts, or voyages, the information accumulated can be utilized to tweak much more focused on offers over each of the four channels, essentially improving the probability of transformation. The all encompassing perspective on purchaser conduct that FlabShedders’ MM gives them more prominent understanding into the brand’s online presentation, alongside more — and more focused on — chances to impact purchaser conduct.>GET ANSWER Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Do you need any assistance with this question?
Send us your paper details now
We’ll find the best professional writer for you!

 



error: Content is protected !!