Thesis statement on citizen privacy and national security

Develop a thesis statement focused on determining if citizen privacy or national security is more important. You can choose any country or region. Your chosen…

Develop a thesis statement focused on determining if citizen privacy or national security is more important. You can choose any country or region. Your chosen topic needs to be specific and might address a question like the ones you see in these examples:Should officials make citizens’ privacy more of a priority than national security? Why or why not?Is national security likely to pose a risk for citizen privacy? Why or why not?You may choose another topic regarding the relationship between citizen privacy and national security as well; just be sure that your main thesis addresses the association between these two ideas.Develop at least three strong arguments in addition to a counterargument and refutation (this resource can assist you in developing the counterargument and refutation). This organization should yield four body paragraphs. Using argumentative topic sentences that include your opinion for each section can help ensure the majority of your essay is argumentative. The beginning of a sample topic sentence might be, “Primarily, exceptional national security is likely to reduce citizen privacy because….” Then, be sure to support that claim with a point or two of researched data, followed by mostly original material that helps to explain how your research supports your claims as well as provides new insights and perspectives. Conclude each paragraph with a sentence that synthesizes the paragraph’s main ideas. Zhuang Zi is a celebrated Taoist savant who presented an alternate perspective about the world and affected numerous scholars during the Warring States time frame. One point of view of Zhuang Zi’s convictions can be depicted in his “Hypothesis of Big and Small”. In this part of thought, Zhuang Zi centers around the effect of the relativity of existence on human observations. He guarantees that the world will be experienced diversely for each being: spatially, the world may appear to be little or enormous relying upon the focal point one is glancing through, and transiently, life may appear to be short or long, likewise relying upon the viewpoint one is glancing through. Generally, in view of this unavoidable relativity, Zhuang Zi contends that people live in a universe of discretionary guidelines, and accepts that there is no “right” point of view, and that all viewpoints are substantial and equivalent. Besides, Zhuang Zi upheld cheerful meandering, and educated to follow “the Great Way” just by holding fast to nature. Through Chapters 1 and 17, Zhuang Zi utilizes the thought of all shapes and sizes to clarify his daoist reasoning. Zhuang Zi opens up the primary part of his works by presenting the Peng fowl. The content depicts the Peng flying creature’s pompous nearness, and cases that it is “gigantic… its width ought to be a few thousand li… his wings resemble mists everywhere throughout the sky” (Chapter 1). Zhuang Zi then compares three moderately little flying animals with the Peng feathered creature: a cicada, a turtle dove, and a quail. The three little animals, knowing about the Peng feathered creature’s capacity to fly huge territories of land, inquires as to whether flying that far is essential. The cicada and pigeon expresses that the most they have to fly is “similar to the elm or sapanwood tree” (Chapter 1), and the quail likewise includes that “the best sort of flying” (Chapter 1) is flying close to ten or twelve yards. This symbolism of the Peng feathered creature and the three little animals represent Zhuang Zi’s conviction that all points of view are equivalent. The Peng fledgling and the three little animals plainly have endlessly various capacities regarding flying. The Peng fowl, fabulous in size, can fly far separations while the cicada, bird, and quail are little and are exceptionally constrained in where they can fly. In any case, Zhuang Zi never expresses that the manner in which the Peng feathered creature flies is the manner in which flying ought to be institutionalized to. Moreover, when the three animals are talking among themselves, they depict a sure frame of mind. They “giggle” (Chapter 1) at the Peng flying creature’s incredible capacity, and even criticizes it, regarding the Peng winged animal’s capacity pointless. This affirms the possibility that there are alternate points of view and norms one keeps; for this situation, the little animals accept that what they are equipped for was sufficient, and that the Peng feathered creature’s capacity was not required in their lives. Through this circumstance, Zhuang Zi exhibits that there is no essential fact of the matter, as nature has set various ways for every animal. The Peng feathered creature is abled with its immense capacity, however it doesn’t imply that the abilities of the little flying animals are invalid. The cicada, pigeon, and quail are made distinctively commonly, and can locate their own one of a kind joys with what nature has enabled them to be. In total, in spite of the fact that the Peng winged animal generally is by all accounts ready to have more noteworthy abilities, Zhuang Zi contends through the viewpoints of the little animals to underscore that their perspective on the world is similarly as substantial, and are equivalent in esteem as that of the Peng fowl. Section 1 sets up an establishment for Zhuang Zi’s advancement of getting one with “the Great Way” – to know one’s place in nature. In Chapter 17, Zhuang Zi delineates that once one understands its place in nature, at that point it can step into understanding and getting one with “the Great Way”. In this part, there is a harvest time flood, and the Yellow River massively floods. Watching this, the Lord of the River is overjoyed and believes that “the excellence on the planet had a place with only him” (Chapter 17). In any case, when the flood arrived at the North Sea, the Lord of the River understood that he was irrelevant as far as significance contrasted with the North Sea. The North Sea at that point reacts to the Lord of the River by saying “… understand your own triviality. Starting now and into the foreseeable future it will be conceivable to converse with you about the Great Way” (Chapter 17). The North Sea is embodied as a figure who appears to comprehend the Great Way. He holds an amazingly modest position on his immensity as he looks at himself to “somewhat stone” (Chapter 17) or an “a little tree [sitting] on a tremendous mountain” (Chapter 17). The North Sea advances by saying that “There is no closure to the weighing of things, no stop to time, no consistency… , no fixed standard to starting and end” (Chapter 17). At the end of the day, the North Sea discloses to the Lord of the River that judgment is relative, and that one needs to experience a re-assessment of his qualities so as to follow “the Great Way”. By and by, Zhuang Zi utilizes the ideas of all shapes and sizes to clarify the relativity of our humanly norms. To the Lord of the River, he himself was the best thing he knew about; in any case, when he arrived at the North Sea, he understood that he was little. What’s more, after addressing the North Sea, we can see that the North Sea accepts that he himself is little contrasted with the universe. Zhuang Zi constantly utilizes the ideas of all shapes and sizes to clarify that human measures are relative. Be that as it may, in Chapter 17, in contrast to Chapter 1, Zhuang Zi further clarifies his position by saying that one must perceive its place in nature so as to follow “the Great Way”. The Lord of the River, in the wake of conversing with the North Sea, comprehend that he should be content with what nature has made him to be. The Lord of the River at that point asks “what should I do and what should I not do?” (Chapter 17). The North Sea at that point answers with numerous answers, which summarizes to just after the course of the immediacy of nature. This embodiment of the waterways appeared in Chapter 17 fortifies the relativism of the qualities saw by each being. In each and every circumstance, one’s observation and comprehension of the qualities are for the most part substantial, be that as it may, is restricted to that particular setting. In this way, Zhuang Zi affirms that there can be no widespread standard that everybody can comprehend. What’s more, since one’s view of the world is so constrained, one is unequipped for really understanding unquestionably the greatest and littlest. In this way, since we can’t comprehend, the main arrangement is to follow “the Great Way”, which is to let everything look for and seek after the immediacy of nature, which is Dao. Zhuang Zi’s utilization of the Peng feathered creature and the pre-winter flood depicts that there are various elucidations of what is of all shapes and sizes, which implies that there will unavoidably be an alternate comprehension of what is correct or wrong, etc. This relativism restrains our insight significantly, which considers the presence of preference and contentions – we don’t see each other because of the distinctions in our points of view. Thusly, that is the reason Zhuang Zi contends that we have to come in wording with the idea that there will consistently be more obscure than there is known. Moreover, he clarifies that we will never comprehend unquestionably the of all shapes and sizes; He composes “… How would we realize that the tip of hair can be singled out as the masure of the littlest thing conceivable? … How would we realize that paradise and earth can completely include the element of the biggest thing conceivable?” (Chapter 17), stressing that our insight is limited, and that we have to acknowledge this acknowledgment. Zhuang Zi deliberately utilizes the juxtaposition of all shapes and sizes through the Peng fowl and the harvest time flood to accentuate the relativity of our measures and qualities, and gives us an answer: to seek after “the Great Way”, the immediacy of nature, or Dao.>GET ANSWERLet’s block ads! (Why?)

Do you need any assistance with this question?
Send us your paper details now
We’ll find the best professional writer for you!

 



error: Content is protected !!