Conducting research can yield very specific and valuable findings, some good and some bad. Even the bad results result in benefitting society in some way going forward, but at what cost? For example, the Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by Stanford University is well-known for its questionable and controversial research methods. This study highlights the need for informed consent and guides future researchers in how (not) to conduct a valid research study. The bottom line for any research study is that participants deserve and need to be protected from mental and physical harm. Using unethical research in the name of research is simply not acceptable under any circumstances.
After viewing the Quiet Rage: The Stanford Prison Experiment video (transcript for video is attached) about the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Stanford University, conduct Internet research to identify an ethical study conducted by a criminal justice agency (as opposed to a scholar-practitioner such as a university). Then address the following in your main post:
Analyze whether the research methods used in the Stanford Prison Experiment were ethical.Explain whether it was ethical to trade the suffering experienced by participants for the knowledge gained by the research.Illustrate the characteristics of an ethical research study conducted by a criminal justice agency.Differentiate the ethical research methods used in the study conducted by a criminal justice agency and the deceptive research methods employed in the Stanford Prison Experiment.Determine what you believe was the worst ethical violation in the Stanford Prison Experiment and how it could have been avoided.
veryone who claims Apple items are confronting a security issue. Do we truly realize what is being finished with the data our telephones are gathering? Apple is one of the top rivals in the innovation business, to stay a market chief I accept that Apple needs to make a superior showing of guaranteeing their clients that the data on their iPhones are being keep private. Dependability is one characteristic that clients consider when looking for cell phones and PCs. Apple has just separate itself from its rivals with their items yet they appear to fall into a similar class with regards to security. Apple has a security explanation on their site that peruses “Each Apple item is planned starting from the earliest stage to ensure that data.” Apple needs to demonstrate to their clients that they are making a superior showing of ensuring their protection than their rivals. Every year they have to keep on keeping security as a center, when they discharge new updates and new items protection must be top on the rundown. On Apples site, they have an exceptionally extensive security proclamation about how and what they do to ensure it. I think this is a decent advance since it tells clients that they are being honest about it. Apple additionally discharges refreshes when issues happen. Apple has straightforwardly said that gather data regarding inclinations yet has guaranteed clients that the data isn’t imparted to outside organizations or the dim web. Apple and all other tech organizations that are in the cell phone market ought to be extremely constant about safeguarding client security. The administration has thought about passing enactment on versatile security. I prescribe Apple keep on refreshing their clients on how they are proceeding to improve their security and how they are ensuring their client’s information. I accept that will separate them from their rivals and keep them at the highest point of the cell phone industry.>GET ANSWER Let’s block ads! (Why?)