Go to https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/films/dustbowl/watch the video on “Surviving the Dust Bowl” and answer the questions while you watch the video. As you
watch the video, please keep in mind that the complete answer may require watching several minutes of
film on a certain topic. Please number all questions and answers.
When did the rain stop and the dust storms begin and how long did the Dust Bowl conditions last?What type of vegetation did settlers find on the Southern Plains at the turn of the 19th to the 20th century?How did states and railroads encourage settlers to relocate to the Southern Plains?Settlers were unaware of the history of and in the Southern PlainsHow did the American government play a role in the destruction of the Southern Plains and how did
farmers respond?During the 1920s the tractor was introduced to the farming industry. How did this change farming?What is the opinion of Milt White and JR Davidson about the bounty of crops being produced in the
Southern Plains during the 1920s?Which states were most affected by the dust storms?What factor, other than the dust and wind, killed crops?The government relief provided to Southern Plains farmers was part of what? How were the government
programs viewed by farmers?What was considered to be the most horrible government program?In 1935 what new plague was introduced to the Southern Plains? What did people do about it?What did people call the epidemic that was caused by the dust storms?Who was John McCarty and what did he do?Who was Hugh Bennett and what was his position regarding the Dust Bowl conditions in the Southern
Plains?Were the dust storms limited to the Southern Plains?What was the government response to the Dust Bowl in 1935/36?What was the government soil conservation program?By 1938 what was the result of the government soil conservation program?When did the rain come back to the Southern Plains and what did it mean?
A Dangerous Method GuidesorSubmit my paper for investigation A Dangerous Method (2011) is a British verifiable dramatization that portrays the account of the convoluted relations of the two dads of analysis, Carl Gustav Jung and Sigmund Freud, and one patient the two of them counseled, Sabina Spielrein. The film depends on the stage play The Talking Cure (2002) by Christopher Hampton and the verifiable book A Most Dangerous Method: The Story of Jung, Freud, and Sabina Spielrein (1993) by John Kerr. The film is coordinated by David Cronenberg and is set apart with a group of stars of celebrated entertainers, including Viggo Mortensen as Sigmund Freud, Keira Knightley as Sabina Spielrein, Michael Fassbender as Carl Gustav Jung, and Vincent Cassel as Otto Gross. The film has been shot on different areas, for the most part in Germany and Austria.dangerous strategy The story underlies genuine occasions and covers the time of 1906-1913, which has been set apart as the introduction of psychoanalytical hypothesis in brain research, because of Carl Jung’s effect on crafted by Sigmund Freud. The film’s primary plot line anyway isn’t logical yet sentimental. It develops around the connection between Carl Jung as a youthful and promising Swiss advisor and an insane psychotic patient Sabina Spielrein, who has a place with a group of Russian Jews. While the names of Freud and Jung have been long notable and regarded as significant figures in twentieth century brain science, and their speculations are still much discussed, Sabina Spielrein’s name had recently been obscure to the overall population. Be that as it may, the lady was obviously an eminent Russian analyst of the post World War I period, one of the pioneers of Soviet Psychology, who was in the long run broken by the system and executed with her entire family by a German SS Death Squad during World War II. The plot of the film is intensely founded on the correspondence that Sabina Spielrein had with both Freud and Jung, just as on her own diaries and clinic records when she was a patient of Jung and afterward Freud. The chief David Cronenberg shows how Sabina had affected both the improvement of analysis (with her then popular origination of the sexual drive as containing both a nature of pulverization and an intuition of change, introduced to the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society in 1912, which is by the way frequently overlooked or given almost no consideration these days), and the job she played in the confused relationship of two splendid personalities of Jung and Freud. As appeared in the film, Sabina appeared to assume a huge job in the mistaken assumptions between the two specialists, which later made Jung make a different hypothesis and mental stream (expository brain science), while Freud remained the organizer of analysis. Evidently, as appeared in the film, it was Freud’s reproach of the profane undertaking that Jung had with his ex-tolerant while as yet being hitched that set flashes to the contention between the two researchers. Regardless of whether Sabina assumed a huge job in the relationship of Jung and Freud, is obviously, profoundly far from being obviously true. In any case, the point of view appeared in the film gives another side to the account of their relations and gives a lot of something worth mulling over. In spite of the way that the film may appear to be a somewhat exhausting recorded dramatization about how a few researchers took a shot at their later-to-become hair-raising hypothesis of therapy, A Dangerous Method ended up being a significant connecting with and fascinating movie that isn’t only focused on a crowd of people profoundly proficient in brain science and its ways of thinking. The chief effectively plays with the splendid material accessible and the entertainers are especially judicious in depicting the advancement of their’s characters. I discover Keira Knightley’s presentation especially prominent. The entertainer has undeniably, precisely, and convincingly went about as a debilitated sociopath, a mischievous sweetheart, a powerless survivor of her youth injuries, and a splendid researcher. The film A Dangerous Method will be an intriguing leisure activity alternative for the individuals who are not searching for activity and excites but instead profound dramatization, sentiment, and an enthusiastic encounter. The exhibition of the fundamental entertainers will help everybody distinctly feel each inward and relational clash, of which there will be bounty on the screen. It just makes sense that the image has been designated for Golden Globe and has won a few other regarded grants.>GET ANSWER Let’s block ads! (Why?)